User talk:Betterday123098

Thanks
For your post to my talk page. No problem, we all make mistakes. I will delete my warning. Dougweller (talk) 21:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mirko Vučinić. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. QED237&#160;(talk) 14:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 14:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Revert
Hi, You are not suppposed to keep reverting. Please read WP:BRD, that explains that after you were bold (B) in your edit and someone reverted (R) you should discuss (D) on the article talkpage or directly with the editor. Also when you add content, especially to a living person, WP:BLP, that content will be removed immediately if not sourced and wikipedia is not a reliable source WP:RS. Feel free to report me if you want (but I doubt you will be successfull as I stay within guidelines and have never been blocked) or you could read the edit summaries and ask me questions why I revert, because I have some experience here on wikipedia and I might be able to help you. Also I moved your posts at my talkpage to bottom of page. QED237&#160;(talk) 14:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You say you have experience but your edits say otherwise, and somehow you cant even get your signature right as you dont link to your correct talkpage. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 15:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Candreva
Hi again,

I saw you edited my talkpage so I thought I should reply.

First of all please listen to what has been said above and why you were blocked. In this case you were blocked for edit warring when you kept reinserting same material over and over again without any discussion after it was challenged. Then when you were allowed to edit you kept on doing same thing again, this time on Candreva page. I told you earlier about WP:BRD (please read it) that clearly states that after you were bold (B) and added the text and then someone reverted you (R) you should have started dicussion (D) and not add content again and again. You might also want to read WP:3RR that says that if you revert or re-add same content three times you may be blocked (unless it is crystal clear vandalism).

Instead of re-adding the content you should have opened a discussion at the article talkpage (which I saw you did and I will reply there as well soon). If that does not get that much attention from other editors I would suggest you go to the most relevant wikiproject for comments and I would have taken it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football for this footballer. You could also go through WP:RFC (request for comments) to request comments from other users.

On my talkpage you wrote that you edited the page again so I could see it, that is something that you really should not do. All old edits can be seen in the page history and there all your edits can be seen so I can see all you sources and text there. Also you could add all your source to the talkpage discussion so you should never use a article for that purpose to show what you want to be added.

About the articles you said it was fine before I came and removed it, that is not true. Just because no other editor had seen it and removed it soes not make it good. Also because a person has a special name does not mean he come from that place.

I hope you take this as a learning experience and come back to wikipedia as a better editor and not pushing your agenda but contributes in other ways. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 11:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.5ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις 11:23, 3 December 2014 (UTC)