User talk:Bettina F. Rage

Welcome!
Hello, Bettina F. Rage, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Ritual Tension
Make sure that you get good sources for the new article you created, Ritual Tension. I imagine that you already have them handy, considering you put together that whole article. If you closed out of the webpages you drew from, then you should be able to check your browser history.


 * This is how you add a citation for a webpage:
 * This is how you add a citation from an online article:
 * KnowledgeBattle | TalkPage | GodlessInfidel ┌┬╫┴┼╤╪╬╜ 10:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ritual Tension


The article Ritual Tension has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 02:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ritual Tension has been reverted. Your edit here to Ritual Tension was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/Illtet/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Ritual Tension
I noticed you removed the PROD tag I added to Ritual Tension. I went ahead and nominated the article for deletion here. Feel free to discuss why the article should keep and continue adding reliable sources strengthen the page's verifiability. Meatsgains (talk) 03:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Ritual Tension
Thank you. I understand your objections, however I would ask you for a bit more time. I’m a fan of this band, they really changed my life, and others as well. And from what I understand band members are beginning to collaborate and release old and new material. In any case I’m new to this system, and we’re trying to pull it together, but there’s a lot to learn on Wikipedia! I attempted to publish a draft with citations of the quotations, including the NY Times, and I think that would have answered some of your questions, but apparently my code was erroneous and the bot wiped it out. I want to get back to improving the article as soon as I can, but I’m very busy at the moment. I promise that I’ll try to answer all your challenges as soon as I possibly can, hopefully as early as tomorrow or the next day. Thanks. Bettina F. Rage (talk) 03:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)