User talk:BetweenBuriedAndMe

Wikipedia
A great resource, however flawed it is.

Those who edit constantly are complete elitists and really do not care about what you have to say, unless they happen to like you. The majority of them have no power in real life and therefore spend all of their time on this site, where they can feel powerful. Is it really necessary to tell somebody that what they did was bad three or four times? No. The reason behind this would probably be from feeling inferior outside of Wikipedia, and the great feeling of strength that stems from telling somebody off, even when it's completely unnecessary.

Removing vandalism is a nice thing that they do, but I would say that the section below is a different type of vandalism, a near abuse of power.

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. To learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia, contact me. Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't care if you blank or amend this message, but if I find another example of you being a WP:DICK like here then I am going to remove your editing privileges. This is the only warning you will get from me. LessHeard vanU (talk) 11:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with User:LessHeard vanU. Whereas you have *some* good edits, your recent edit to User:Danteferno was at least unnecessary, certainly a breach of WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA and bordering on WP:HARASSMENT. Your next tranche of edits determines your continued permission to edit here. Please choose them carefully. Rodhull  andemu  22:40, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Infinite Order


The article The Infinite Order has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * per WP:NALBUM upcoming albums do not pass WP:NOTABILITY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RP459 (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)