User talk:Beulahlondon

Hello Beulahlondon. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Beulah London, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Removing cited facts
In this edit to Beulah London, you removed cited facts. Given your obvious conflict of interest with the topic, this is now allowed. If you feel that the facts are misrepresented in the article, please start a discussion at Talk:Beulah London, and other editors who do not have a conflict of interest will evaluate your points and make the necessary corrections to the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Really, don't do this again. If the information about Pinto-Hervia is no longer valid, provide a citation to verify that, and add to the article that the information has changed.  Do not deleted facts that are actually cited.  If you do not like the information about initial funding coming from friends and personal investments, that's too bad.  That information is cited to a reliable sources.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)