User talk:Beulobwaaa

December 2020
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that in this edit to The Matrix, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, i didnt think that was a mistake, i just edited the plot and did a summary a less shorter (how the summary should be) and i dont really understand why you restored it Beulobwaaa (talk) 19:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

A bit* Beulobwaaa (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Matrix. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 19:31, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop remove my editing it could be seen like vandalism m, and i will obligated to report you.

Thanks. Beulobwaaa (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Matrix, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Matrix was changed by Beulobwaaa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912625 on 2020-12-07T19:41:51+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Matrix. - DVdm (talk) 19:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Diffamations
Hello,

Can you comment on my inability to write concise plots that are fun to read? please stop deleting my changes to the matrix page succinctly, and also promptly stop defaming me. Beulobwaaa (talk) 19:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry wp:competence is required. If you mutilate the article again, you will be blocked. - DVdm (talk) 19:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

I read the article, and i dont see wherein i'm not able to edite. Beulobwaaa (talk) 19:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Hut 8.5  20:37, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The next time a bunch of people revert one of your edits, don't just ignore them and keep making the same edit again and again and again. Discuss on the article's talk page if you must. In any case the version you're trying to push is pretty obviously inferior to the original.  Hut 8.5  20:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello,


 * As you're blocked, I've chosen to respond to the message you've left on ClueBot NG's talk page here.


 * Firstly, ClueBot NG is not human. Therefore, it cannot perform any checks to see if your edit is genuine. It works on vandalism-probability. I don't know what but something has gone into that edit to make the bot think that it is possibly vandalism. If that's wrong then please follow the link that the bot provides to report it.


 * You've actually been blocked for is edit warring. You put through your first edit here and that was removed by another editor who then left you a message on your talk page to explain why it was removed. You've then said that you didn't understand that but you've then made the same edit again numerous times. This is why you've been blocked for edit warring, by doing this it looks like you're arguing with other editors. Please use the time out to familiarise yourself with our five pillars. If you find yourself in such a situation again, rather than war on an article, I'd suggest that you start a discussion on the relevant article talk page.-- 5 albert square (talk) 22:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)