User talk:BeyondTheGreenLine

Welcome!
Hi BeyondTheGreenLine! I noticed your contributions to Arutz Sheva&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 20:14, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Sweet, thanks for the information and warm welcome. I will look into the resources. Nice replacement link for your "talk page".

BeyondTheGreenLine 03:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

ARBPIA alert
Zerotalk 21:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

I said stop harassing me please. BeyondTheGreenLine 15:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I attacked no one. I stood up for myself and requested to not be harassed. Your cooperation with the harassing person has made you a facilitator of harassment. I will not be subjected to this and remain silent. Please stop. BeyondTheGreenLine 15:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't believe too much in deletion so I left everything I wrote prior. I'm not sure exactly your role in this situation yet or your position on Wikipedia but have left you a message on your page- somewhat intended for the other user genoV84 but also for you. I'm intending all this chaos over the Noahidism page to end and for Wikipedia to simply be an objective encyclopedia funded by public dollar donations and developed by volunteer collaboration. The reason I wish this is that it is what 1. will make Wikipedia better in the future and 2. more importantly, what I thought the mission of and purpose of Wikipedia was. I hope this message finds you well. Peace.

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 17:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Noahidism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Noahidism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your intentional, deliberate, and persistent removal of informations and sourced content from reliable sources qualifies as disruptive editing and vandalism on Wikipedia.--GenoV84 (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * GenoV84: This is not "vandalism"; please stop using the term when referring to good-faith editors. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Are you sure? Take a look at this.--GenoV84 (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am sure. No matter how disruptive this is, it is not done with the intent to damage the encyclopedia. Please remember to assume good faith. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Noahidism. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

This is blatant politically motivated harassment and will be seen as such in the arbitration that will result of you do not bow to an agreement, admitting that you are attempting to bully a Jewish opinion out of Wikipedia for anti Semitic purpose. I’ll let you guess which 9 letters are after my name and figure out how you want to move forward. This isn’t going away for you. Utilization of policies as a sword rather than a shield won’t work. BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 03:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

I said leave me alone...I meant it! BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 03:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

I will say this one more time, leave me alone or I will go speak with US attorneys about this. The aggressive attempts at a FIRST instance of someone who has been a Wikipedia editor for far less than a year to shut down based on Jewish opinions is incredulously obvious. I will defend myself inside and outside of Wikipedia. This is not a negotiation. This is a statement of what is to come. You do not get to ride off tax free dollars to subversively spread hate. Like I said, all you have to do is cease harassing me but now I'm adding reversion of anti-semitic statements to the list. You know what you are doing and you are doing it on purpose. Mazel Tov. Bless The Name!

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 03:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia as a battleground for personal attacks, legal threats and casting aspersions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

This was an obvious gaming attempt that will fail. I will file an arbitration for this action and will continue. Incorrect responses will be responded with approaching the United States Attorneys Office.

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 05:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

The way that was worded was so rude. I'd like an arbitration. I will file one. Thanks.

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 18:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Note from an observer: "the person that reverted my edit on Arutz Sheva is an account that runs 'workshops' on Wikipedia to help make the platform exhibit pro-Palestine viewpoints". That person was me and I have never run a workshop or anything similar about any aspect of Wikipedia editing. Zerotalk 00:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Your legal threat would be here. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 00:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

If you view that as a legal threat I don't but yes then, whatever you perceive as such has been clearly rescinded and just for comfort I'll state it again, its rescinded.

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 00:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

I also think it is not accurate to view anything I said toward Zero as a legal threat. I thought you were speaking of GenoV84.

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 00:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Also, I don't like the idea of workshops being run that are intended to push a certain viewpoint but if it is allowed I will intend to do the same. I don't have time to dig up right now what it is I read but I did read about "workshops" being done. It is unfortunate if I have drawn an account into this that isn't truly attributable to the "workshops" but I did read it and can get it later if necessary. No one is going to get sued here - is that good enough? False statements though I think need to be removed and will engage the appropriate process to do so.

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 01:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

I would though also like to put in addition, the 'workshops' issue is a distraction and has nothing to do with the block on my account.

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 01:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

I also think this would be best solved by Palestinian and Jewish Wikipedians. Not because I think the block has anything to do with it because it doesn't, but because others have drawn the issue in based on my description justifying why I am on Wikipedia. I described my history here based on a claim I wasn't here to create an encyclopedia (which is untrue). This post was a single edit arguably about the conflict but not really and the second edit described had to do with anti-semitic statements misrepresenting sources.

BeyondTheGreenLine, Greetings from Area A. 01:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 07:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)