User talk:Bfaabaa

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Nokia N8 appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ~ Red Rover  (Talk to me!) contribs  10:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

The decline of Nokia and symbian should be treated at Nokia and symbian, not at Nokia N8, though it could be mentioned there. Andries (talk) 06:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nokia N8. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Acdx (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

And let me echo the above in regards to the Nokia N9, stick to the facts, supported by reliable sources and don't add your own commentary. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Twitter is not a reliable source except for very limited circumstances (comments he made about himself) - it doesn't matter that he writes for engadget - if he's mentioned it *in* an engadget article, it could go in. A forum post based on that twitter is so far from reliable that it might as well be in outer space. Moreover, your writing style is still not NPOV. --Cameron Scott (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)