User talk:Bfrasure

Orphaned non-free media (File:Entertainment Edge Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Entertainment Edge Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Techedge Radio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! T.I.M(Contact) 02:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * I am the creator of the image.Bob Frasure (talk) 04:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Quick question - which image are you discussing? If it's something that may be disputed (like a logo, picture of a living person, etc) then you may want to file a ticket through WP:OTRS giving Wikipedia permission to use the material. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Another note - I looked at your sandbox and saw that you wrote an intro. Would this be for the article as a whole or for a specific section? If it's for a specific section it would be good, but it's a bit too specific for a lead intro. It looks like it's probably for a language preservation section, which would be a great addition, but I just wanted to make sure. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Turbo Zone Direct
Hello, Bfrasure,

I just noticed that you removed your message from my talk page which was a request that I simply forgot about. Would you still like this page restored to your User space? I apologize for dropping the ball here. Liz Read! Talk! 19:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

I didn't remove my message, just moved it to a more prominent location. I would still like the deleted article, thank you. You didn't drop the ball, there's just a lot going on in your world :)
 * Thanks for your understanding. You can find it at User:Bfrasure/Turbo Zone Direct. Liz Read! Talk! 19:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Tayback (August 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tom Tayback and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tom Tayback, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tom_Tayback Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robertsky&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tom_Tayback reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 20:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Tom Tayback moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Tom Tayback, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sreeram Dilak 15:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Techedge Radio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Techedge Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Techedge Radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sreeram Dilak 15:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Bob Harvard.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bob Harvard.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 02:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom Tayback for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Tayback is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tom Tayback& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 09:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, Bfrasure,
 * Do not move an article from main space to Draft space that is the subject of an active AFD discussion. Please participate in that discussion rather than moving the article around. If you have questions about AFDs or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Other accounts
Hi Bfrasure. Is User:Blkfrasure also your account? Spicy (talk) 02:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC) talk User:Blkfrasure Blake Frasure is my son and recently joined Wikipedia since he started taking college classes. I've had him help me with a couple articles I'm working on as well. bfrasure 5 November 2021 (UTC)

I was the clerk on Sockpuppet_investigations/Bfrasure. I had initially assumed that the two accounts were operated by the same person, and since there was no response to my question above for several days, I suggested that the Blkfrasure account be blocked and that the user be allowed to continue editing from this account. However, the explanation posted here seems plausible to me. I would advise Bfrasure that having a family member do things such as move an article you wrote back to draft during a deletion discussion is still considered improper, and that the connections between these accounts should be clearly disclosed to avoid confusion. Also, if either of you are writing about people or organizations that you are connected with in some way, you should read and follow Wikipedia's guidelines on editing with a conflict of interest. The rest is up to the admins, of course. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Spicy (talk) Thank you for responding and for keeping Wikipedia clean. These articles take days to research and write. We go back and forth on the different things that are being written based on things we find out about the topic. Blake put a lot of time into the article that was pulled, especially since he is so new. When he saw it marked for speedy deletion he moved it to draft to avoid losing all of the work. Bob Frasure (talk) 5 November 2021 (UTC)}}. -- Bob Frasure

Concern regarding Draft:Next Best Action for Healthcare
Hello, Bfrasure. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Next Best Action for Healthcare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cubital region
Hello, Bfrasure. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cubital region, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Next Best Action for Healthcare


Hello, Bfrasure. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Next Best Action for Healthcare".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cubital region


Hello, Bfrasure. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cubital region".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cubital region


Hello, Bfrasure. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cubital region".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)