User talk:Bge20

Welcome!

Hello, Bge20, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 13:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Left-right politics
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Left-right politics. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TFD (talk) 18:24, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Well, I might be wasting my time, but that would be a pity, since all I'm doing is turning a half-baked article full of unsourced ignorant POV into one that's a little more balanced, and indeed sourced.

I arrived and made a careful edit with a long note, and ti was deleted with 'appears to be OR'. Charming.

So I go in again and make a series of careful edits, each annotated. Which of those do you disagree with?You've done a petulant mass-reversion without even looking.

So, for example, I replaced the (unsourced) statement that the first political parties were formed in the 19th century with the sourced, linked statement that they were formed in the 18th. DO you go and have a look at the Whig entry? No, you revert it unread.

I replace an unsourced, PoV assertion that all green parties have rejected socialism with a more qualified phrasing - and this is reverted.

Conservative parties are generally unsuccessful? Really? How's that for some unsourced POV - which you stuck back in.

And then, rather than actually discuss anything, you throw a big scary red sticker at me - go away or leave my little fiefdom or i'll ban you.

I suggest you set your ego aside and have a look at the article. It's junk, full of unsourced factually untrue POV assertions. Is that how you like it? Bge20 (talk) 21:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * You havew been reported to the edit-warring noticeboard and may reply here. TFD (talk) 00:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:07, 9 August 2011 (UTC)