User talk:Bgensits

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:14, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Bongwarrior. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=457070031 here].  pluma  Ø  00:32, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Bongwarrior, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=457070563 here].  pluma  Ø  00:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid  ( Talk ) 00:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BRYAN GENSITS


A tag has been placed on BRYAN GENSITS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  pluma  Ø  00:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Usually I'd say that seven years is a lot of time for people to mature, but edits such as this, this or this by your sockpuppet give me pause. Maybe can comment? Huon (talk) 18:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I understand your hesitation, I vaguely remember making the account on a school computer years ago and reading over the edits you linked honestly doesn't sound like me. In any event, I would really appreciate the opportunity to help my friend get the article on Zelda Samuels published. To prove to you that we are attempting to legitimately contribute, here are the first two paragraphs (unformatted since I don't have access to the sandbox):

"Zelda Samuels (b. December 22, 1928, Brooklyn, NY), also known professionally as Zelda Sands (ASCAP), is an American songwriter/lyricist who is best known for the song Lookin’ For A Love (To Call My Own), co-written with J.W. Alexander, which was first recorded by The Valentinos (Womack Brothers) forSAR Records, (#8 Billboard R&B 1962). Other successful versions of the song were recorded by The J. Geils Band(#39 pop 1972) and Bobby Womack (#1 Billboard R&B March 1974).  From January 1961 until February 1964, Samuels worked as office manager for SAR Records and KAGS Music, the recording and music publishing companies established by Sam Cooke and J.W. Alexander in early 1960.  The majority of her songs were co-written with Alexander and registered with KAGS, which would later be acquired by ABKCO Records, Inc. After leaving SAR/ KAGS, Samuels became personal manager for singer Mel Carter, a position which she held for 27 years. Carter was the only recording artist she ever managed."

I hope you understand, thank you again for your time. Bgensits (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Personally, I support the unblock. From what I can tell, you have had more than enough time to mature in any way the admins consider inappropriate. Foxnpichu (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm Kevin. I am willing to look past the stuff from 2011, but I do have some concerns about the article you're working on now and I want to check in with you about it before any action on the block so that you're not disappointed by current policy. Our policy on who can be the subject of a Wikipedia article can be found at WP:NBIO, and it's a fairly high standard. Can you provide some sources (let's say, three) that meet the standard of providing "significant coverage [of Zelda Samuels in] published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject"? Best, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 02:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)