User talk:Bgy7et86f4igkf7

November 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Cool S has been reverted. Your edit here to Cool S was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQdxHi4_Pvc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:25, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Cool S
When adding content to an article, like you've done to Cool S, please keep Wikipedia guidelines in mind. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that inline citations be present as support for any material challenged or likely to be challenged (and for all quotations) in mainspace articles. Your recent edits to the Cool S page, which make note of the symbol's apparent appearance in the 1533 painting The Ambassadors, have all been unsourced thus far. Unless you can find reliable sources that would support mentioning the painting in the article, I would suggest refraining from re-adding such information from now on, as that constitutes original research. – Matthew  - (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)