User talk:BhaNikii

March 2018
Hello, I'm Bahudhara. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sparsh Khanchandani have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Re this edit on Dl2000's talk page,, see No legal threats. Bahudhara (talk) 00:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Undo your changes as nothing was promotional
Going through the changes there is nothing which is promotional. Her page wasn't updated & thus the same was done. I don't see any reason for you to call it promotional. She has achieved the following updates & nobody can deny to that truth. These updates were made in order to tell & update her fans & readers about the same. The information now on the page is very old & less for she has achieved a lot. With time updates are needed as the person evolves which is why there is an edit option enabled. I have documented proofs to support with these updates. Do you have any to deny them? U completely removed her dubbing mentions & achievements beyond acting. This is an information sharing platform and every page shows some achievements of the personality, movement, campaign etc. That is the reason I updated it with whatever she has accomplished. I have nowhere mentioned about her asking for work or promoting herself. As a trustworthy source I am just giving the correct updated information. I do know how a page is operated & hence I ask you to put it back how I left it. Otherwise I will have to take necessary actions. If u still have anything to say, ask or clear please discuss. BhaNikii (talk) 11:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi BhaNikii, Wikipedia is not an "information sharing platform", it is an encyclopaedia, and its core standards state that contributions must be written from a neutral point of view, be independently verifiable, and contain no original research, which means that you just can't add material because "you know it to be true" - it must be referenced by a reliable published source. Wikipedia also has strict policies on biographies of living persons, and on avoiding the use of promotional language, and any edit that fails to adhere to these standards can be challenged or reverted by any other editor, or rewritten in a more appropriate manner. Bahudhara (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, since you have stated in your message on User talk:Dl2000, "I am managing Sparsh Khanchandani's social medias", this indicates that you have a conflict of interest regarding the article on Sparsh Khanchandani which you must declare there if you intend making any future edits. Bahudhara (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Sparsh Khanchandani. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Bahudhara (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

hi Bahudhara, you seem to be very ignorant as you are rebutting yourself. Kindly google the meaning of an encyclopedia before writing, you'll get your flaw there... I am quite open to constructive criticism but this what you are doing is complete bashing. I will be adding all references to support the edits once you let them be there. you seem to have taken it as a personal game & repeating the same things in just different sentences. There isn't any conflict of interest as someone has to update the information time to time, better be someone who gets it from that personality first hand. There isn't any soapbox attached as I earlier said, she has undeniably achieved all those things. still if u find anything that you are comfortable with (I still dont see any reason for it) please mention & I shall clear your doubts & if relevent I shall also not mind changing the tonality of it. lets get a solution & end this trivial matter with no base BhaNikii (talk) 18:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Your recent editing history at Sparsh Khanchandani shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sparsh Khanchandani, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Dl20000, I too want this trivial matter to end once & for all. I never indulged in any kind of wars. I consider your advice of not undoing without a discussion but it seems that you & Bahudhara have a pre structured all of this & drawn conclusions. Please refer to my earlier messages on this page & understand my point of view too. I want you both to also stop denying her & undo in a reasonable manner. If the tonality is a problem then I shall change it but complete removal of her achievements is not acceptable. I shall re change it & keep it as neutral as possible, if there is anything that still bothers you mongers please specify so that I can educate you & if reasonable I shall change it further. Thank you. BhaNikii (talk) 18:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Sparsh Khanchandani
Hi, I undid some of your contributions to the page Sparsh Khanchandani as they were unsourced. Also, you have sourced Youtube which is not considered reliable according to WP:YTREF. The Youtube channel 'Manch TV' is not verified plus not very notable. Use reliable sources. Thanks Vivek Ray (talk) 12:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Going through your talk page I found this. Just wondering what did you mean by "managing Sparsh Khanchandani's social medias". Can you tell me? Thanks Vivek Ray (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC)