User talk:Bham phys/sandbox

Wikipedia Project Peer Review - Bam phys

The content that has been added and edited so far uses accessible language and seems to be understandable to someone without significant insight on computational geophysics. The tone is formal and impersonal, and the content is relevant. Overall, the article is better sectioned off and contains more relevant information now, compared to the stub, which mainly highlighted academic programs.

One thing - Is the amount of academic programs listed necessary? Or can it instead be quantified in a sentence?

Warstepnick (talk) 16:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)