User talk:Bharatgopal

July 2009
Please stop making vandalistic edits of articles such as this one removing China's ICBMs from the Intercontinental ballistic missile article.

Those missiles are well known and well sourced. If you remove them or proceed with further additions of questionable information as you have to several other pages in the last few days, I will have to assume you're vandalizing on purpose, and your account will be blocked from editing.

Nationalistic zeal is no replacement for accurate well sourced information. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

HAL's Light Combat Helicopter
I have changed the photograph that you put in the Infobox of the article on HAL Light Combat Helicopter, for it was a frontal photo which didnot show any details of the helicopter.

In almost all the photos on wikipedia, in the infoboxes of various Attack helicopters, photos from one side of the helicopter are displayed, because they present a better profile of the helicopter.

I have moved your photo to the gallery section and replaced it with the previous one from the edit at 14:33  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.191.35.22 (talk) 15:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Light Combat Helicopter.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Light Combat Helicopter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MilborneOne (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Arihant class submarine. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. large removals must be discussed first on article talk pages -MBK004 08:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Arihant class submarine, you may be blocked from editing. Cptnono (talk) 22:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article GTRE GTX-35VS Kaveri has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. The fact that you blanked out an entire section of sourced text, while summarizing your edit as "grammer", suggests that you are attempting to remove information without other editors noticing it. This kind of behavior is not tolerated on Wikipedia and will get you blocked if you do it again. AtticusX (talk) 13:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

April 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Agni-V. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.   Ð ℬig  XЯaɣ  09:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Agni-V, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.   Ð ℬig  XЯaɣ  14:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2013
Please cease your disruptive edits. Continued edits of this nature is vandalism and will lead to you being blocked from editing. -- Hdt 83     Talk 04:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)