User talk:Bhardwajsat

Speedy deletion nomination of Global Foundation for Civilizational Harmony (India)
A tag has been placed on Global Foundation for Civilizational Harmony (India), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Global Foundation for Civilizational Harmony (India) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 13:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Your hangon rationale
When you claim that "...we are posting our article (in addition to our website which is already on the web) is to disseminate the information in the area of interfaith harmony and conflict avoidence,..." that fits our definition of advertizing. See WP:NOBLECAUSE. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 13:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * If that is so then there are so many foundations like Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation which have their articles on Wiki. Can you please explain to us how those article are different. See, As i mentioned earlier, if you guys think that something should be edited out of our article, you can tell us so. But deleting the whole article in the garb of 'advertising' is defeating the purpose of this popular information website.


 * Those are not here to advertize their causes, and they are notable as attested by the fact they are mentioned in multiple third-party reliable sources. Please do not give us the argument that if there's an article on Wal-Mart there should be articles on every mom-and-pop store in the world (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). That has been tried almost on a daily basis, and it has always failed. If you ask why there's an article on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation while we reject the article on yours, you MUST show, for that argument to be valid, that your organization is at least as large and as well-known as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * First of all, our foundation is not any 'mom-and-pop store'. If you are hell bent of deleting our article despite the authenticity and non-advertisement intention, you are free to do so. Who are we? Afterall, administrators of Wiki have every right to do so. But if you really care for validation, then they are plenty, provided you are open to it. First of all, our foundation has got the presence in the directory of Development Dialogue on Values and Ethics, a unit of the World Bank conducting evidence-based analytical, operational and capacity development work on issues related to faith, ethics and development. Second, the revered people whose blessings are with our foundation, are no ordinary mortals Like His Holiness Dalai Lama, Sri Sri Ravishankar, Cardinal Oswald Gracias and so on and so forth. Likewise there are plenty of reasons which can satisfy your need for validation, provided you guys are open to it.

Proposed deletion of Global Foundation for Civilizational Harmony (India)


The article Global Foundation for Civilizational Harmony (India) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references after having been around for years; would appear to be something operating out of a backroom with no real prospect of third-party verifiabilty

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)