User talk:Bhavana21484

IF YOU WISH TO INCLUDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE ACTORS CAREER. YOU ELABORATE THE CURRENT DESCRIPTION DONT ADVERTISE UR FAVORITE ACTORS BY PUTTING PEACOCK PHRASES LIKE EXTRAORDINARY, HUGE FOLLIWNG, TERRIFIC EXTRA FOLLOW WIKIPEDIA POLICY ON LIVING PEOPLE DESCRIPTION ALSO UR SOURCES FROM TELUGU CINEMA AN CINE GLITZ ARE USED AS EXTERNAL LINKS AN DNOT REFERENCES DONT JUST ADDD NON SENSE LIKE YOU TUBE VIDEO LINKS

SEE MAHESH BABU, K VISWANATH ARTICLES HOW SIMPLE AND INFORMATIVE THEY ARE (61.2.209.91 (talk) 05:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)).

____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ 

FIRST OF ALL, WHAT YOU ARE DOING ISN'T MAKING SENSE. JUST BLINDLY REPLACING THE CONTENT WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING WHETHER THE INFO PRESENT IS CORRECT OR NOT?

* YOU HAVE PROBLEM WITH THE PEACOCK PHRASES? THEN CHANGE THEM

* YOU HAVE PROBLEM WITH EXTERNAL & REFERENCE LINKS? CHANGE THEM FROM REFERENCE TO EXTERNAL

* YOU TUBE IS A NON SENSE? THE CONTENT HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE SONGS. HENCE, THE LINKS. AND I GUESS THEY CAN BE UPDATED IN THE REFERENCE/EXTERNAL LINKS.

'''MAHESH BABU & Mr. K.VISHWANATH? are these the only articles present on WIKI? have you seen Aamir Khan's? have you seen Shahid Kapoor's? have you see R.Madhavan's?'''

WIKIPEDIA is place where we have all rights to give our inputs and improve the article. THE MORE THE BETTER. People would like to know more about an actor rather read just a two line info and leave the page. And you, without having a proper info about the actor have been replacing the whole article altogether. You have a problem with some content, then change it. Why you changing the whole article? And what? THIS ARTICLE IS LIKE AN ADVERTISEMENT??? wondering what kind of advertising strategy are you finding in this. Just mentioning about the actor has become an advertising to you? If we have any info mentioned about the actor it means that's advertising? then all the articles on wikipedia come under advertising?

'''ALL I WANNA SAY JUST DON'T BLINDLY CHANGE THE INFO. IF YOU HAVE PROBLEM WITH THE CONTENT EDIT IT RATHER CHANGING THE WHOLE INFO.''' 19:44, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Bhavana21484 (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC) Bhavana

HELLO
YOU PLEASE EDIT OR ADD INFO TO THIS ARTICLE

STUPENDOUS SUCCESS, HUGE FAN FOLLWING??/ WHAT DO U MEAN??? EVEN AMITABH BACCHAN S ARTICLE DONT HAVE THESE MANY PEACOCK TERMS YOU ARE WELCOME TO ADD INFO ON HIS CAREER IN TAMIL CINEMA AND TELUGU CINEMA PLEASE DONT USE VANDALISM OR SPOIL THE IMAGE OF TEH ACTOR BY ADVERTISING HIM IN WIKIPEDIA WIKIPEDIA IS NOT FOR ADVERTISING PEOPLE PLEASE FOLLW THE RULES- BY INCLUDING THE CURRENT REFERENCES —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.2.209.65 (talk) 07:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

CONTINUED
I HAVE SEEN ALL THE ARTICLES INCLUDING RAJANI KANTH NO ARTICLE USES THE TERM EXTRAORDINARY, TERRIFIC EVERY ONE KNOW THAT UDAY KIRAN IS TALENTED AND HE HAS THREE CONSECUTIVE HITS LIKE EVERY OTHER ACTOR UDAY KIRAN IS TALENTED AND WAS A VICTIM OF POLITICS IN INDUSTRY THAT DOESNT MEAN U PROMOTE HIM LIKE A CONSUMER PRODUCT IN MARKET (61.2.209.65 (talk) 07:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)).

CONTINUED 2
UR WELCOME TO ADD ALL THE INFO ON UDAY KIRANS CAREER TO THIS ARTICLE PLEASE RESTRAIN TERMS LIKE EXTRAORDNIARY, GREAT DANCE SKILLS, TREMENDOUS FOLLWOING INSTEAD U USE TERMS LIKE CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED ETC YOUR ORIGINAL ARTICLE IS ONLY AN ADVETISEMENT, IT IS TOUGH TO EDIT THAT - YOU PLEASE ADD UR POINTS TO THIS ARTICLE I AM AN UNDAY KIRAN FAN MY SELF PLEASE ADD UR EXTRA POINTS TO THIS ARTICLE THIS ARTICLE HAS VERY GOOD REFERENCE AND LANGAUGE AND GRAMMAR QUALITY (61.2.209.65 (talk) 07:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)).

YOU CRAZY?
> You just know how to revert the article eh? Why can't you edit it?

> Read the content properly as the so called peacock terms are already removed. Mentioning positives of an actor is equal to spoiling his image? wow wow amazing. Thanks for enlightening me. Gosh!

> Now why you talking about politics? Just posting an article doesn't mean he is a product. Don't talk what ever you feel like

> I'd repeat, if mentioning about an actor is like an advertisement, then all the articles on wikipedia come under advertisement category. I came across articles that have terms like "Huge Mass image"... don't these come under peacock terms? If you are so concerned, please go edit all the articles...why you just behind one article?

You may be uday fan, you may not be uday fan. I'm least bothered about all those. What matters to me is the article and we have removed the Peacock terms yesterday itself. Don't just blindly revert the article without reading the changes.

//THIS ARTICLE HAS VERY GOOD REFERENCE AND LANGAUGE AND GRAMMAR QUALITY// WE KNOW THAT.