User talk:Bhavanam

Speedy deletion nomination of XSEED Living Knowledge System


A tag has been placed on XSEED Living Knowledge System, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yunshui (talk) 09:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at XSEED Living Knowledge System
- SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of XSEED Living Knowledge System


A tag has been placed on XSEED Living Knowledge System, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Ol Yeller Talktome 14:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey!
Hi Bhavanam, I got your message. The article you created was deleted because it didn't make a "claim of notability". Here at Wikipedia, we have a guideline that determines what will be included in the encyclopedia known as WP:Notability. It has several different sub-guidelines that determine what subjects are considered notable in different categories. For instance, there's a sub-guideline regarding baseball players and another just for politicians. The company you're trying to create an article would most likely have to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:ORG for it to have an article here (you can read those areas so that you don't have to read all of WP:N). In short, what determines if a subject gets included in the encyclopedia is a little different than noteworthy or importance. If you read through WP:GNG and WP:ORG and think that XSEED qualifies, write backi here and we can take steps from there. I'll be watching this page (it's on my watchlist) so if you make any comments here, I'll be alerted.

Hope that helps.  Ol Yeller Talktome 16:48, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!:-)
Thanks Ol Yeller  ! Just to help you understand exactly how technically challenged I am, I had trouble trying to figure out how to even reply to your message! Anyway, as you suggested, I read through the WP:GNG guidelines. The innovation I am talking about, has also been covered by the MIT Journal of Innovations (http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/inov_a_00011). Since it is an innovation I am talking about, think it fits with Wiki guidelines. If you sense there is merit in what I am saying, how can I fix what i wrote earlier?

Please help me get started!

Problems with upload of File:Xseed-5-step.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Xseed-5-step.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)