User talk:BheanSith


 * BheanSith - After discussing your block with TheSandDoctor, we both decided to unblock you and give you the benefit of the doubt. :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:37, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, BheanSith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Sad Puppies does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 02:34, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Sad Puppies. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 02:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your message
Hi BheanSith! I received your email message with a request for an explanation of the block I imposed upon your account. Looking at the Sad Puppies article, you were editing under the anonymous IP user 64.184.95.185 (and possibly other IP users as well). You were blocked for vandalism while you were editing under this IP. Blocks apply to people, not to just users or accounts. When you used this account to continue editing the article, you violated Wikipedia's policy on block evasion; hence, this account was blocked in order to enforce the original block applied to you. If you have objections or wish to appeal, please read Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, and follow the instructions to request an unblock of your account. I apologize that an explanation and notice wasn't left here after the block was imposed, and I hope that this message and response helped to explain the reason behind the block. Best regards -  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:21, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Girth Summit that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)