User talk:Bhoke2081

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 12:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Epoch Times, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 15:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 15:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Epoch Times, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger  talk   04:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

They are all sourced stop changing it to untruthful information. Bhoke2081 (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Epoch Times; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger   talk   06:05, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Why don’t you read the the links like I read yours. The links I am posting are from a fact check website. The fact checkers list Epoch with Fox News. The only reason to dig in about this is because of your bias. If the fact checkers said they were far right then I wouldn't change it. Bhoke2081 (talk) 06:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Grey joy talk 06:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Patriot Front, you may be blocked from editing. Aquillion (talk) 06:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RegentsPark (comment) 14:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)