User talk:Bhoydyy17

July 2022
Hello, I'm Mako001. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Han Kwang-song—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 22:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ProClasher 9 7  ~  Have A Question?  22:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  ProClasher 9 7  ~  Have A Question?  22:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Han Kwang-song. Yoshi24517 Chat   Online  22:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * , shouldn't somebody be blocked after four vandalisms? Dr Salvus 22:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, "vandalism" already implies malice; there is no innocent vandalism, just innocent disruption. Vandalism-only accounts are usually blocked indefinitely, and sometimes without a warning at all (cf. WP:DISRUPTONLY, part of the blocking policy). That said, before a report at WP:AIV is made, and sometimes before action is considered by administrators, the user should generally have been warned. The idea behind this general requirement is to assume good faith where possible, and to interpret as vandalism only what is really clearly done with malicious intent. Disruptive editing done in best faith can also lead to blocks, of course, but such editing is usually reported at WP:ANI.
 * And that all said, I'm usually not hesitant to block for blatant violations of the biographies of living persons policy, as the damage done by letting such users edit further can be quite high. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

There were a few of his edits that tripped the abuse filter, and therefore, were not shown on his contributions page.  ProClasher 9 7  ~  Have A Question?  22:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)


 * And this, yes. "Warn" or "Disallow" entries in the user's filter log mean that the user has been shown the filter's warning message, at least. Some of them are kind, specific and informative (MediaWiki:Abusefilter-unexplained-removal), some are rather unspecific (MediaWiki:Abusefilter-disallowed). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)