User talk:Bhumiya/Archive 2

Race movie
Thank you for creating race movie. I was quite surprised to learn that it did not already exist in Wikipedia, and I appreciate that you've taken the time to create it. It looks good so far, so I have nominated the article for WP:DYK, and I hope to see it there in a few days. NatusRoma | Talk 08:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Germanic language zones2.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Germanic language zones2.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 11:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Kurd stub
Have you seen? --Mais oui! 06:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Stub_types_for_deletion

Image copyright problem with Image:う.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:う.PNG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 06:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kogal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kogal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 13:57, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Award
Wow, I don't know what to say! (Other than that I was forced to look up "prolificacy" and "Barbara Cartland") -- ha ha. Two awards in one week, that is really something. I'm glad my contribution is appreciated and hope to run into you on more articles in the future. Badagnani 02:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Poster
I think it looks good. Unfortunately, I wish we had a higher res image of it for use here. K1Bond007 05:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking that it wasn't supposed to be released just yet, thus the really low quality. That's pretty bad for Sony. I mean, have you seen the stuff they kicked out for their other AAA franchises like SpiderMan 3? You can already get hi-res promotional stuff etc and that movie is about a year off (granted that they can photoshop that together, rather than something like Bond where they need something a little more real). I hope they release something soon though. K1Bond007 05:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Basilosaurus Image
The image is missing the back legs, which were tiny. I also think that Basilosaurus had a fluke a tad bit bigger than that. GBA 18:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * I'm altogether sorry for having taken nearly a month to reply to your query; I hope you won't infer from my dereliction anything other than that, having, consistent with my obsessive tendencies, undertaken several projects here, I worked on those projects to the exclusion of all else. My bad.  Inasmuch as I am anarcho-libertarian, you wondered how I'd appraise the Libertarian Party of America and its platform; it was not, by the way, at all untoward for you to ask, and so the expresssion of your concern that the question was inappropriate was, although appreciated, wholly unnecessary.  In any event, I have done a bit of organizing with the LP of Wisconsin but prefer generally to work to support libertarian-minded candidates in the Democratic Party (with whom we'd generally associate the Democratic Leadership Council, although I don't know that such a conflation would be accurate nowadays), if only because the prospects of any third party in the United States aren't particularly propitious.  I do think the Free State Project to be an excellent idea, one that surely holds the best chance for the proliferation writ large of libertarian ideals, and I could imagine myself living in New Hampshire someday in furtherance of the Project.  I've had occasion to attend many Democratic Party gatherings–indeed, I've been fortunate to have shaken the hands of each of the last three Democratic candidates for president, and, since I've gotten to know Russ Feingold rather well, perhaps the next one as well–and I often define myself, rather provocatively, I suppose, as a Dixiecrat: neither do I support government-enforced segregation nor do I support government proscriptions on private segregation, largely because I'm disinclined to support government at all and certainly hold absolute liberty of contract most dear.  The Dixiecrats, though, were wholly wrong on many things, and so I think the Democratic Party that I support to be not unlike the Republican Party of Taft and Harding, et al..  One problem (of many, of course) with which the LP is faced, I think, is that the former member most prominent, Ron Paul, is affiliated with the Republican Party and, more to the point, believes that the state may (and should) pass legislation interdicting abortion; most in the LP, I think, as I, find abortion to be an issue of property rights, of which the proper disposition should be the same disposition we'd support vis-à-vis assisted suicide or drug use, viz., that the state ought to keep its hands off one's body.  The LP is also (and perhaps irredeemably) associated with objectivism or amorality, such that many believe that, in the absence of certain government compulsions, individuals will not care for others in society.  Even as I tend toward the amoral and objectivist and can't say for certain that I would/will be an eleemosynarily-inclined individual, and even as I might term provincial the moral schema by which many American are "afflcited", I recognize that there will not, at least for some time, be support for a party that appears not "to care about American citizens" (witness the horrific march of the Republican Party from small to giant government, under the guise, in part, of compassionate conversatism).  The only views for which I have less tolerance than those advanced by progressives, who tend, IMHO, toward the irrational, are those advanced by neo- and religious conservatives, and so I am usually in sympathy with the Democratic Party, which I think, in fact, to be the more libertarian of the two major parties (and certainly of late given the shift of the RP under Bush); I will vote for LP candidates, but only if the eventual outcome of a given race is evident or if it is impossible to choose the lesser evil from amongst two candidates whose views are repugnant to libertarianism.  My rule against voting for Republicans isn't categorical&mdash;I've supported two, one in a titularly non-partisan local race and one in a US House race in which the Democratic candidate, a doctrinaire progressive, was sure to win, and thus only symbolically&mdash;but I can't foresee another circumstance under which I'd vote for a Republican, nor one under which I would think the Libertarian Party to be a viable political entity.  It is better, I think, to change a major party from within (since some people will always support a party in view of its history and name, irrespective of its contemporary constitution) than to grow a minority party.  So, there ya go.  Never should you ask me an open-ended question, as you'll get, well, this (feel free, of course, to remove from your talk page after before reading, in order that you shouldn't exceed the 32kb suggestion with one message.  Joe 21:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Photos of executions in the PRC
Why you retain that [www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350794/posts this photos] were shooted in the late 1980's and not in the late 1990's or 2000 (I retain that this photos are false)? --Vess 10:35, 9 July 2006 (UTC)