User talk:Bhunacat10/Archive 20

Short descriptions numbers
Hi Bhunacat10, You recently changed the tally of manually added short descriptions on the project page to 56000 articles. How did you get this number? Cheers, &middot; &middot; &middot; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 18:32, 30 December 2018 (UTC) (please ping with reply)
 * Hello Peter. This is the result of a search on the wikitext "short description" in article space, which picks up all uses of the template. In the top right-hand corner you currently see Results 1 – 20 of 56,545. The words "56,000 articles" on the project page already link to the search page, so you only have to click there. OK so there are a few false positives like the one for Global Biodiversity Information Facility, but it does say "about"... Bhunacat10 (talk),  18:45, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, Thanks. That is simple enough, but rather basic. I am looking for a way to analyse the manual addition of short descriptions in a bit more detail. Like how many editors are adding them, and at what rates. Cheers &middot; &middot; &middot; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Peter This is a small step displaying usage of User:Galobtter/Shortdesc helper for one identified editor (also includes amendments to existing SDs). You could run this for each of the 90 or so users who have the script installed, but you would need to ask elsewhere whether there is a way to do the analysis in bulk and broken down by time period, or to include those adding SDs without the script Bhunacat10 (talk),  23:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It only allows 500 results, so not very useful for this purpose. I think this is going to take some more powerful analytical tools. Cheers, &middot; &middot; &middot; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 07:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Bhunacat10. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ABhunacat10 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ireland cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Lawrence ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ireland_cricket_team check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ireland_cricket_team?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Raj Kumar Goel Institute of Technology
I think we clashed, I was trying to do some cleanup, but if you want to pare it back even farther, we'll use your restored version.Naraht (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry Naraht, do go ahead, but please note that the expansion was by a blatantly COI editor whose account was blocked, and went on to repeat the edits while logged out, so we may not want to encourage that behaviour Bhunacat10 (talk),  16:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I think you are right, I'll start with your undo and trim from there.Naraht (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Looked at yours reversion and I don't see any issues with it. Rolled back my changes and added it to my watchlist. Thanx!Naraht (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Clarifying of intentions of editing and sources/references
Hello Bhunacat10, Thanks again for teaching me how Wikipedia works. I have responded to your message to me last night in your message to me. Sorry, don't know how to do it in the best way. Please have a look there and come back to me if you have any further comments. Kherngren (talk) 10:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bulb Energy


A tag has been placed on Bulb Energy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2019 (UTC)