User talk:Bhuvannalla

hai can i have ur details!!

January 2014
Hello, I'm Malik Shabazz. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Pension, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

List of Highest grossing Indian films
Please put your comment supporting telugu language. here

Marchoctober (talk) 08:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I started a discussion at ANI. The talk page won't work so we need to get Ricky banned and then we can fix all that Tamil nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.122.101 (talk) 07:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:59, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Disruption at List of highest-grossing Indian films
These two edits were disruptive since you are clearly aware that their is an ongoing RFC on that topic. If you (or others) continue in this vein, I will need to issue blocks or topic bans, since the only other way to deal with such disruption/edit-warring is to fully-protect the article, which prevent even non-controversial improvement from being made. So please don't repeat such edits till the RFC is closed and the issue decided. Abecedare (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stop removing reliably sourced content that is under discussion on the talk page. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration discretionary sanctions alert
Abecedare (talk) 19:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Kailash29792 (talk) 07:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Bbb23 (talk) 07:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Just like I admonished Plutonium at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films, your edit here I absolutely consider edit-warring. There's no harm in leaving the other version until the discussion is resolved. One of you has to demonstrate some adult behavior here, and divorcing yourself of whatever emotional attachment you have to the wording is crucial here. Plutonium at least had the courtesy to open a discussion, which you should/could have done as well. To say that there's nothing to discuss suggests to me that you don't care about the outcome. If you don't, leave Plutonium's change alone. Or, if you do care, (and it seems you do), please participate in civil discussion and arrive at a solution or compromise. The edit-warring needs to stop and you're about a freckle away from being blocked for it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of most expensive Indian films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Discuss on Talk page if you have any view other than established norm on Wikipedia
The dubbed version collection is included in that language category. First get boxoffice knowledge otherwise you will be blocked for edit warring--Rashkeqamar (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC) There is no need of giving explanation. I follow what Wikipedia follows.

stop it
in terms of films produced yearly

this is the break down provided by CBFC india for films released in 2016

Hindi	340 (digital) and 0 (celluloid), total of 340 Tamil	291 (digital) and 0 (celluloid), total of 291 Telugu	275 (digital) and 0 (celluloid), total of 275

please stop writing after hindi film industry for 100000 times.Uthprerakam (talk) 07:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Size of the film industry does not depend only on the number of films released every year. The numbers change every year. Sometimes, Telugu industry will produce maximum numbers, sometimes Tamil and sometimes Hindi. It is one of the factor to determine the size. The revenues in terms of gross and share, number of screens, global reach, etc will determine the size of an industry. If someone accepts or not, Hindi film industry is at top position followed by Telugu. So, there is nothing wrong with the wordings I have mentioned in the article.

August 2019
Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Saaho seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Open up a discussion at WP:ICTF. As far as I know, one was opened up but no consensus has been reached Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force/Archive_5'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Saaho shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Csgir (talk) 12:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Can't you follow simple WP:BRD? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Saaho. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – bradv  🍁  15:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Dr.Pinsky. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sundhi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Soundik
Hi I guess you are right about soundik as they are selling them as Dalit.

I edited the page 4 time but Pinsky always keep on mentioning it as Dalit. How to resolve this ? JockerEdit (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

He have to stick to the fact and we have to remove the word Dalit but Pinsky is accepting the same JockerEdit (talk) 20:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

I am sry you may found lot of typo as i am typing from my cell.

I guess you know how to edit in wiki we have to correct Pinsky and remove the word Dalit from soundik JockerEdit (talk) 20:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Also ekdalian is not a judge who pronounced the verdict JockerEdit (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Bhuvannalla
 * @JockerEdit
 * Hey! I'm with you guys... we've to do something. As it is misleading people's. Let's come together Raj Hanse (talk) 18:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your changes were not reflecting properly
Hi, I have reverted your changes because your edit removed complete list from the first section “Highest-grossing films” in. PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 18:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)