User talk:BiH/Archives/2014/April

In the news
Hello BiHi, you are In the news E x nihil (talk) 07:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Did I nominate this article for deletion? It's kind of foggy to me to remember, but I do remember an article about an artist that was posted with no references whatsoever, while the content was not in a neutral tone as well. In a pile of newly created article (which I patrol every day), I can't always make a right decision, and that is why deletion contest exist. I feel bad if she thought that I was "a bad person" for nominating her article for speedy deletion. --BiH (talk) 09:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've said this before, but I'll say it again - an article with no references is not (and never has been) a criteria for A7. In your shoes, I would have done a Google Books search for her name, where you might have found entries in The Arkansas Journey, American Artist and The Mural as a Teaching Tool in Elementary Education, plus the date of death would have suggested her notability was more likely to rest in print sources such as books, magazines and newspapers. I appreciate it kind of sucks to be labelled a bad guy in a major national news outlet, but you've done the right thing to show remorse and hopefully you can take this as a useful leaning curve. Be cool. Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   08:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. I know I have done I similar myself, it is very hard to work out what's going on sometimes, especially if one is on Huggle. Somebody tried to delete my first article Shallow Water Blackout and while it caused grief at the time it forced me to work out how to set up a new page so that sticks, and actually, my original version probably should have been deleted. It's a tough world out there in Wikipedia. More important is that you are in there improving Wiki. E x nihil (talk) 13:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Is it okay to link to PDF links?
Since as I'm trying to find some info about a animator/visual effects artist, the best site I could find was written in a PDF format, but I feel bad if I link it as one might think it is my work and/or I don't know whose work this is even. http://janetoglemater.com/images/Biography_of_Joe_Hale_-_Disney_Animator.pdf So yeah not sure what to say about this... Wgolf (talk) 16:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this might be just fine to cite some stuff in the article, of course, among all other references and sources. --BiH (talk) 17:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Okay thanks. In other news I almost marked one article as a hoax due to seeing this "Giant PIka. Giant Pika is an extinct mamal" I was thinking "Yes Pikachus are real...keep saying that" then I looked over it and there really is an animal named that.

Wgolf (talk) 20:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC) Oh and there is a odd case of 2 people on the visual effects page who are linked to another article (one of the 2 actually won an Oscar even!), here are the 2: Alec Gillis and Tom Woodruff, Jr. not sure what to do about either. Wgolf (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If they are notable, and they are, just create their articles by updating their pages which are currently redirect pages to the movie article. Of curse, you will have to see where those pages link so you can update other interwiki links as well. --BiH (talk) 05:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Linguisticgeek. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nimapara (Odisha Assembly constituency), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Linguisticgeek (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Chen San and Wu Niang
I declined the speedy deletion of this page because it did not appear to be made up by the article creator or their associates. Rather, Chen San and Wu Niang appears to be a traditional Chinese opera. See, ,. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:58, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Noted. It was just written so weird that I thought it was made up by the user. Thanks for the insight. --BiH (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

1995 470-European-Sailing-Championship
Hallo BiH, kannst du mal bitte schreiben was das soll? Weblinks sind auch Quellenangaben. Danke, Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 18:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hallo. Weblinks sind Quellenangaben, aber da gibt es eine Regel für Beschaffung - siehe hier: WP:References und WP:Citation. Sie müssen Inline-Zitate nach Wikipedia Regeln liefern. Ich hatte die beste Absicht. Wenn Sie Hilfe benötigen, kontaktieren Sie mich bitte. Gruß --BiH (talk) 21:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * In dem von dir gesetzten Baustein steht etwas anderes, und zwar das keine Quellen angegeben wurde oder von mir aus nicht alles bequellt wurde. Das ist aber falsch, in der von mir angegebenen Quelle ist der Artikel komplett belegt, dies ist damit auch ein Inline Zitat. Eine Aussage ein Beleg. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Ich habe einen anderen Tag in den Artikel eingefügt. Jeder Artikel muss mit Inline-Zitate angeführt sein. Es tut mir leid für Missverständnisse. --BiH (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Du bist nicht auf den 2. Teil meiner Aussage eingegangen. Ich habe es jetzt im Artikel klar angegeben woher der Nachweis stammt, und das es das offizielle Ergebnis ist. Das ist so bei fast allen Sportergebniss-Artikeln so, siehe z.B. 1995 European Judo Championships. Bei Ergebnis-Tabelle sind meistens keine Inline Zitate angebracht. Quellenangabe in der Fußnote sind da ganz normal. Und die Informationen aus den zwei Sätzen, Zeit, Ort ect. habe ich auch aus der .pdf-Datei. Wo anderst ist nix zu finden, da 1995 die Verbreitung des Internets noch nicht so fortgeschritten war und der Verband es nur als .pdf-Datei veröffentlicht hat. Wenn du immer noch nicht zu frieden bist, das schreib genau was du willst und wir sehen, ob andere das auch so sehen, ansonsten nimm den Baustein wieder raus. --Jean11 (talk) 16:55, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Alles ist in Ordnung, danke für deine Erklärung. Mein Deutsch ist nicht so gut und ich habe dich nicht so gut verstanden. Viel Glück. --BiH (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hvala, odobrenje je dobro, zašto ne na bosanske sa? To me iznenađuje. --Jean11 (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Anisopleura subplatystyla, BiH.

Unfortunately A2-33 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"Hi, I've unreviewed this as the text is copied from another site and lacks context (eg a species of what?) I think another opinion would be useful."

To reply, leave a comment on A2-33's talk page.

Batt O'Shea Wiki page . . ..
Hi BiH,

Thanks for your approving my Batt O'Shea wiki page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batt_O%27Shea

You from Churchill too ?

Tamjk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamjk (talk • contribs) 09:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lunatic (Kongos album)
Hello BiH. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lunatic (Kongos album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''WP:CSD does not apply, the artist does have an article (blue-linked). No refs, may not pass WP:NALBUMS, but you will have to consider PROD or AfD.''' Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lloyd Saxton


A tag has been placed on Lloyd Saxton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:13, 30 April 2014 (UTC)