User talk:BiH/Archives/2014/August

Proposed deletion of List of e-commerce services in Singapore


The article List of e-commerce services in Singapore has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be a directory of mainly non-notable companies. Of those that do have articles, some are present in multiple countries, and the ones specific to Singapore are telecomms companies. The criteria here are not tight enough to be a valid list article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 07:11, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spring.me company logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Spring.me company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Tagging too soon and too fast
Hallo, I know it was back in March, but I've recently seen this edit of yours. There are two major problems with it: The brand new editor who created the article came back a couple of days later and did a lot more work on it, and other editors have since imrpoved it further and formatted the refs more conventionally. Sadly, that editor, whose first article this was, has never edited Wikipedia since. It may be that the instant and incorrect tagging contributed to this. See also WP:BITE.
 * 1) It was one minute after the article had been created. It is never appropriate to tag such a new article unless it is an attack page, total rubbish, or obvious copyvio. Many editors put up the outline of a page and then continue to edit it within the next few minutes. It is upsetting, especially for a new editor, if the article is plastered with tags in those few minutes. Please do not be in such a hurry.
 * 2) Because you were tagging it so fast, you did not notice that it had references. They are not done as normal inline citations, but they are respectable-looking sources. It would have been appropriate to tag the article (a little later) with citation style or perhaps cleanup, but not unreferenced.

Please be more careful in your tagging, and do not tag articles within minutes of their creation. Thanks. Pam D  13:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * There is relevant advice at NPP:Care should be exercised when reviewing very new pages. Tagging anything other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense only a few minutes after creation may only serve to annoy the page author. Pam  D  13:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your advice, I will keep that in mind for my future edits. However, the fact that he/she has not appeared since might imply that he/she it used a SPA to make the edits, as the article was indeed leaning towards promotion rather than a NPV article. Indeed, he/she might be inexperienced, so he/she wrote it in that manner. Sometimes I have so much "work" when patrolling New page feed that I often do something wrong, especially with tagging. Thanks once more. --BiH (talk) 15:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of e-commerce services in Singapore for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of e-commerce services in Singapore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of e-commerce services in Singapore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 20:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm SmileBlueJay97. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, AKSH TUTORIALS, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. SmileBlueJay97 talk 21:20, 17 August 2014 (UTC)