User talk:BiH/Archives/2014/December

Accessdate in cite templates
Hi, BiH. I saw you did on the Christmas tree around November 23, 2014. Excellent stuff. Couple of quick tips. In cite templates, the accessdate parameter refers to the date the url parameter in the cite template was last accessed. If there is no url parameter, you should not use accessdate or it throws a CS1 error. Some CS1 errors, like this one, are not visible by default so if you want to see them (which I recommend, especially for very active editors such as yourself), you can follow the instructions at Controlling error message display. Also, most of the time, you'll want to use date instead of year in cite templates these days. This change was a few years ago and it seems like it will stay around. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers, Jason Quinn (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Noted and thank you so much for the tip. I will make sure it does not happen again. --BiH (talk) 05:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Oana Lungescu
Hi BiH! Thank you so much for your help! Liebe Grüße, Nacht-min ''' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nacht-min (talk • contribs) 20:30, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Assamese musical instruments
Hello BiH. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Assamese musical instruments, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this isn't an obvioustest page. It includes a credible assertion of some encyclopedia-worthiness - "This is a list of musical instruments used in traditional music of Assam, India" and includes pre-existing articles. The title may be better as List of musical instruments used in traditional music of Assam, India or similar, but that is something to be discussed on its talk-page. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:28, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi again, BiH. My apologies for the snarkiness of the templated message - this has reminded why I don't like using it. I think the article could be differently titled, or possibly a redirect if policies do not support a stand-alone article or stand-alone list. What do you think? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. I understand the issue with the templates :) When it was nominated, it was practically an article with a lead sentence and the "example" table. I thought someone was trying Wikipedia (and the last edit was over 2 hours ago when I saw it) and nominated it for deletion. The name seems fine to me, but it can be proposed otherwise on talk page. Cheers! --BiH (talk) 10:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)