User talk:BiH/Archives/2014/July

Mailimate
Hi there, I wasn't editing this page to promote, my initial purpose was to introduce to users who might be interested in mailimate through a professional channel like wikipedia, because just consider it, people who don't know mailimate will not come to this page in the first place, how am I able to promote it to someone who's already interested? However, I'm not contesting your deletion, but rather, I'd like to ask you to remove this page entirely because I was just trying out editing a wiki page, so the content is not professional enough, and the big red information you added can do harm to the reputation of mailimate. Please remove this page as soon as possible. Thank you.——SEROLAF (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * First of all, thank you for your edits. However, Wikipedia is not a "professional channel" as we say. There are some rules that have to be respected and the main is that all content must be verified by reliable sources from media. Please see WP:REF and WP:RS for more details. --BiH (talk) 09:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand, I will study the rules before my next editing and remember to add reliable sources available, this page was really just a trying-out. Please remove it, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SEROLAF (talk • contribs) 09:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Not so fast with the CSDs
At least two of your recent CSDs have been reverted, Aetrium due to circumstances you had no way of knowing about, and Internet Gold Golden Lines for reasons which should have been obvious.

I can't blame you for CSD'ing Aetrium, but since the Internet Gold Golden Lines was such an obvious mis-use of CSD, I'm asking you to slow down and be more careful. When in doubt, use PROD or AFD. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  19:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Dr. Samieh Rizk
Oh, sorry. I was speaking it a bit of shorthand; I meant only that the new sources appear to be sufficient that the old AfD can't be applied because the new sources are sufficient to merit reconsideration of whether the article meets WP:N or any of it's daughters before deletion. I suspect that an AfD would ¿probably? delete it if no additional sources are found, but I'm not positive, and I haven't looked for new sources. If you're not convinced by the sources, and do a look around and can't find any/enough to satisfy you, by all means nominate it. But if you're satisfied, leave it. I'm not particularly in favour of, nor against, another AfD. Wily D 08:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

offshore 2020
Hello, I just update the page with more inline citations and references. Please advise if this is okay. User:BennyOIL OIL  11:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: MediterraNaut
Hello BiH. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of MediterraNaut, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to products. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Hurricane Bertha (2014)
I thought that the article was a hoax too, but what is this: ? Piguy101 (talk) 00:41, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * See here. Thanks. --BiH (talk) 00:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 00:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * You may want to re-request deletion. Piguy101 (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

VPal
If you can find out who is behind VPal, and who is running it, I will appreciate it. Jackzhp (talk) 01:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

patience please
Hi there. You have just reviewed a page I just created: Marselisborg. I am here to remind you to be patient when you review new pages. Wait a day or two to make your reviews. I was in the process of creating the page and wasn't finished. There is a ref up there now, but still the article could benefit from more sources though. RhinoMind (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Totally understand, but I have to tag a recently created article since it will be hard to trace it later due to a huge amount of newly created articles. I did not mean anything bad, just tagged it for lack of refs in that moment. Now I see that you updated it. Thanks and cheers. --BiH (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Symbolic religiosity
Category:Symbolic religiosity, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 17:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)