User talk:BiObserver

Hi.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo for Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Iranian politics general sanctions notice

 * Hi Vanamonde. I am surprised to see myself in this list. I have only participated in civil discussions and never made any changes to the articles. In total, I have 10 edits related to MEK. Would you please explain the criteria of selection of users for sanctioning?


 * My second question is about the scope of the sanction. I have occasionally make edits like this. Does the sanction includes these types of non-controversial edits?
 * Best, Taha (talk) 02:41, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The sanctions regime covers all edits, but if you take care to edit within policy, you will not face an individual sanction. I don't have the time to look into the background of the edit you're linking to, but if it's genuinely non-controversial, it's fine. If you do violate policy, though, any uninvolved admin can sanction you, without have to obtain community consensus for such an action first. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:46, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, please read the notice carefully...it specifically says that it does not imply misconduct. You got the notice because you are editing in a topic that now has, essentially, stricter rules for good behavior. If you follow those rules, you can continue to edit as before; you haven't been sanctioned at this time. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)