User talk:Biblib

Hello. I see you last edited the Lafayette Park in DC wiki. I would like to suggest that the paragraph about the most recent destructive protests is filled with both inaccuracies and politically charged bias. Last time I edited this page, I was given a ban for vandalism and told to try and talk to the editor so here I am.

Why is it okay for there to be misinformation in this wikipedia?

Welcome!
Hello, Biblib, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Benjamin of Lesbos, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! buidhe 06:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Benjamin of Lesbos


A tag has been placed on Benjamin of Lesbos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. buidhe 06:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Bagumba. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Shooting of David McAtee have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Per WP:ELNO, we generally do not link to other wikis. —Bagumba (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Lesvos
I would like to request a symposium with you. My family is from here and I have a lot of questions that you seem knowledgeable enough to answer. Elmvox (talk) 03:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Help? You undid my edits but suggested they were worthwhile
Hi! I'm somewhat new to wiki but not to crowdsourced articles. I did a somewhat large edit last night all in one burst, and didn't know that wasn't kosher. In the log, you noted that you recommended re-doing a number of the edits correctly, but. Uh. I don't know how exactly I went wrong. I didn't think I deleted many things, but did spend hours citing every sentence I wrote. Would you help point me in the right direction?

FaerieOfTheFay (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC) FaerieOfTheFay

Wright deletions were wrong
I didn't realize that the edits that I'd added to the "Killing" article had been made by some editor before I'd done so, but had been deleted, but I'm of the opinion that both the Fox and Washington Times pieces were both very well documented and pertinent, even though I'm not a fan of either source. As far as I'm aware, neither is considered to be a nonreliable secondary source. I think both articles were of much higher quality than either source is commonly and properly criticized for. I left an extended explanation at the "Killing" article, and hope you read it and the original sources, before you repeat your deletions from that article. Thanks. Activist (talk) 17:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)