User talk:Biblicalprofphd

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * And as has been explained on the talk page, the problem is your poor quality sourcing and WP:UNDUE focus on WP:PRIMARY authors -- what you need are academic sources which describe the general "America is the Beast" theology as a movement. It has nothing to do with it conflicting with anyone's beliefs, so your disclaimers are nonsensical and unwarranted. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).

The sources you cited at Great Whore of Babylon do not differentiate it from Whore of Babylon. Have you considered paying attention to recommendations given to you, or even asking for help? Ian.thomson (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Ogress smash! 19:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Ogress smash! 19:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)