User talk:Biblog

Welcome!
Hello, Biblog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Donal Ryan. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DoebLoggs (talk) 09:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Recent edits to Donal Ryan
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Donal Ryan without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:40, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Donal Ryan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  Grey joy talk 10:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Greyjoy. My apologies. I thought I gave valid reasons, but accept that they mustn’t have met the standard. I would ask though that the changes I made to the description are reinstated as the current description is misleadingly narrow, focused as it is on one novel published 8 years ago. Wikipedia articles are routinely used by event organisers and journalists and audiences are given outdated, inaccurate information. Biblog (talk) 10:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)