User talk:Bicycle user

November 2014
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Matthew Parris because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Matthew Parris with this edit. Thank you.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 09:57, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Matthew Parris
Hi there,

Just leaving a quick note to ask you to discuss the insertion of the cycling material in the Matthew Parris article to the talk page, where there is a discussion. The material is clearly POV and not suitable in its current form. Thank you. Atshal (talk) 22:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

November 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Matthew Parris. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, specifically, if you again add back the content without discussing the changes on the talk page of the article, you will be blocked from editing. So please use the talk page of the article to discuss your additions.  Wifione  Message 16:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Hi Bicycle user,

Further to this, please lets discuss the content and edits in the talk section here. Look forward to hearing from you. Atshal (talk) 21:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Matthew Parris. Your latest edit on the article also contravenes our WP:BLP policy. Please note that you cannot add personal attacks about living individuals anywhere on Wikipedia. You will be indefinitely blocked in case you continue such behaviour once this block expires. Once this block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Wifione  Message 16:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)