User talk:Bidgee/Archive 45

Orphaned non-free image File:Nine2009.png
Thanks for uploading File:Nine2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Great Southern Rail (Aust) logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Great Southern Rail (Aust) logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Hotel Hollywood
Hey Bidgee, can you take a look at my user page. I need some help. I created an article on the iconic Hotel Hollywood. Now I made a mistake and posted a draft with the name Hollywood Hotel, within hours the submission was declined due to too many issues with tonality, reading like an advertisement and not enough independent sources, I am a bit gobsmacked to be honest (somewhat offended). Anyway I need to delete that page with the wrong title and I have published the new one for review. I just want someone else to look at it as I cannot see how it reads as an advert. Significant is that the publican died last week and she was a sydney icon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hotel_Hollywood pretty please --Carrolquadrio (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I think change the article name from the hotel to Draft:Doris Goddard and the change the lead/introduction text to focused more on Doris, as the article currently largely focuses on Doris and have a subsection on the hotel. Not seeing any "advertisement issues" and "not enough independent sources" is a typical flag some people fly when they don't like an article. The building itself is listed on the City of Sydney Local Environmental Plan (There is a little information on Office of Environment & Heritage). Bidgee (talk) 11:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I thought about making the Doris page and then changed tactic but I agree. Do you think it is worthwhile making two seperate articles as Hotel Hollywood is notable enough in it's own right (architecture, history, not to mention its niche clientele ). Hope you are well. thanks.Sending a beer :) --Carrolquadrio (talk) 13:35, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem, I've made some fixes and also added a photo of the hotel. I'll try and watch what happens though a little busy with CSU, WMAU AGM and my trip next week. Bidgee (talk) 10:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Southern Cross Austereo logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Southern Cross Austereo logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Canberra Capitals logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Canberra Capitals logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Woolworths-Everyday-Rewards.png
Thank you for uploading File:Woolworths-Everyday-Rewards.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)