User talk:Bidgee/Archive 7

Olympic photos
Hi Bidgee. I have another nag for you.... select the most appropriate photos. Link in my sig  YellowMonkey  ( choose Australia's next top model ) 08:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Mitsubishi Challenger
I think you were right to revert the removal of a citation from this page. I noticed the anon editor returned and removed it again, so I've restored the previous info. The issue was discussed on the article's talk page previously, and the argument in favour of keeping the info was never refuted. Thanks for the previous edits. --DeLarge (talk) 09:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand this edit
This one. Marco and all Hurricane, Typhoons, and Tropical Storms are Tropical Cyclones. Tropical Cyclone is the overarching term that describes all of these phenomenon.  Plasticup  T / C  03:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Exactly, a tropical storm is a tropical cyclone, the NHC doesn't need to state it broke a record in order to break a record. If Marco had TS force winds extending only 10 miles, it beat Tracy by 20 miles and thus making it the smallest TC on record. Emarsee (Talk • Contribs) 22:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think that anyone is disputing that Marco will beat Tracy if proven - but as good wikipedians we need to await an official confirmation before stating this to be a fact. Patience will prove this point and until then I have adjusted the comment at Marco and removed the suggested of fact arising at Tracy. I have also added comments at the talk pages.  Best wishes. -- VS  talk 03:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Protected
I've applied temporary semiprotection on this talkpage for a while, due to the level of personal attacks. I'll keep an eye on it and reaply if they creep up again.  Gazi moff  01:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Woolworths Logo 2008.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Woolworths Logo 2008.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Image Title - Locomotive NF5 (possibly NF2)
Under the Whyte system of wheel notation used for the classification of steam locomotives, only the locomotive wheels are counted, tender wheels are not.

If you check the images at (truncated) comrails.railpage.org.au/cr_locos/r_nf, you'll see that the 2-6-0 locomotive is coupled to a four wheel tender.

A further clue is that these locos were catalogued by Beyer Peacock as 'Colonial Moguls', 'Mogul' being the common designator for 2-6-0 type locos.

It's a little more involved than just counting the visble wheels and multiplying by 2, and anyone knowing anything about the subject would concur. Maybe you'd like to correct your incorrect 'correction' and eliminate your misinformation.

Mvjs RfA
Hi Bidgee. As someone who's known he as an editor basically since my start on Wikipedia, I'd appreciate your input at Requests for adminship/Mvjs. Mvjs (talk) 07:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the userpage cleanup
Somebody opened the idiot jar this morning I think :) -- Longhair\talk 09:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah well you might retire every month with bugles - but hey i consider literally walking away in total silence when i come across some articles and edits :) SatuSuro 12:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * idiot jar notwithstanding - over there cultural imperialism, and vacuous bad english stubs in the indonesian project sometimes leaving me gasping for air :) - exercise would kill i suspect :( SatuSuro 12:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Heheh there are some very very obscure talk items from about 18 months ago on talk pages of self and others that are sufficiently impervious as to leave most readers grabbing glasses of water to throw over their computer screens in depseration :0 SatuSuro


 * All too late - the baskets and the cases are so confused - it would very diff for the medicos to work out the anatomy and what is what unfortunately :( SatuSuro 12:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Qantas Flight 72
Hi, you made a comment regarding my request for the recreation of this article on MBisanz's talk page. This has now gone to a deletion review at his request. Please feel free to share your comments there if you wish. -- Rob.au (talk) 10:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- Rob.au (talk) 12:08, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Macquarie Southern Cross Media Radio Stations
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 12:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Can you look at my document, and advise?
Could you look at THIS and advise if I am preparing it correctly, as I have never done such before. Thank you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Warning
There's no need for that. Please do not post to my talk page if I asked people not to. JRG (talk) 11:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Win TV
I know that but it is available via the mystar box, I never said it was broadcast by Austar...I was pointing out that Austar (a major Pay TV provider) has made it available. and also if Win has nothing to do with Nine why is WIN Television the sole Nine Network affiliate and On 30 January 2006 the station relaunched its logo to coincide with the Nine Network's fiftieth year of broadcasting and it also says that Despite the station's ownership of Nine Perth, plus The regional affiliate for Channel 9 is WIN TV......need I go on. Thanks Thuringowacityrep (talk) 12:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Australian Coat of Arms
Since you're obviously watching several articles that I am watching, I thought I'd clarify some edits that I've just made. Image:Australian Coat of Arms.png and Image:Australian coat of arms 1912 edit.png are essentially the same image. However, the second image is a bit darker than the first and the detail doesn't seem to show up as well in the reduced size it becomes in infoboxes and thumbnails so I changed some instances of the second image to the first image. It seems more consistent to use one image rather than two different versions of the same image. Obviously, both of these images are far superior to the svg version that they keep getting replaced with. The changes I made to the infoboxes were just minor formattting changes. --AussieLegend (talk) 22:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Campdraft
My issue isn't who took the photos, it's the tendency of these things to become an endless gallery of "here is that event in my location" -- For example, Show jumping is a mess that way, though better than it used to be. The point is, if you can caption the photo to explain how it fits with an article about campdrafting (i.e. "horse must move the cow in given direction" or something), that it one thing, but to add an image that seems to show nothing more than "people campdraft in Queensland too" photo is just making a gallery. If you have something that this photo illustrates that the others don't caption it accordingly. Otherwise, you are just creating a gallery, and galleries are discouraged on wikipedia. Montanabw (talk) 23:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Your photo is a bad example, as the horse is out of position in regard to the beast and not watching it. There is only 40 seconds to complete the course! Cgoodwin (talk) 01:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Australian Alphanumeric State Route Markers
While you're at it, you may as well do A12 and A19 ... Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Launceston Air View
Can the photo be used now as the restrictions have been changed? Aaroncrick (talk) 06:41, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Griffith "Plane-on-a-stick"
Uploaded my photo and found a better one already uploaded. Hope one or both are useful. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 06:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Koppen climate classification map
What do you think the best map is for the Koppen climate classification article? Press olive, win oil (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Adelaide
Tut tut. (Even though I agree that it should be Mediterranean), a google search doesn't prove anything. (In fact, I'm not altogether sure how you would "prove" such a thing.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I agree CSIRO should be a reliable source. However, it still doesn't "prove" it. Don't worry - I'm just being pedantic about use of words. i.e. I'd rather you use softer phrases than "prove", but I'm probably in a minority, so ignore me. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 05:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

You have an "admirer"
See User talk:Bidgee2. Given that he's making the edits you got another user blocked for, I'm suspecting a vandalism account, rather than another account for you. Fun. Jclemens (talk) 07:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

If you have time and/or interest
Hi Bidgee, as the result of a gentle rollback I performed on the article Galah, Victoria a friendly discussion has ensued here. Whilst it may not ultimately be the best location for such a communication to fully develop, for now, if you have the time and/or interest, can you provide your thoughts also? With thanks. -- VS talk 09:35, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Yellow Simian
Good job. Thanks - I'm sure I'm not the only one who appreciates your effort. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

User and talk page seems to be fixed.
I just fixed a move made by User:Jazzmand who moved your user and talkpage to I am an Asshole but I have since reverted to how it should be and have reported them to AN/I. Bidgee (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to choose Australia's next top model ) 03:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Launceston Tourism
The Cataract Gorge, a natural wonder of Tasmania and only five minutes walk from the city is Launceston's largest tourist attraction.. If you don't like the sentence, have you got any suggestions on how it could be improved? Aaroncrick (talk) 11:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

OC500LE
Here is an official news report to the fire that occurred on the 21st of July 2008 to confirm the information reported by the TWU page Perth Now. In my personal opinion, I find a newspaper report to be far more bias and uninformative when compared to a TWU investigation. With six engine compartment fires on Transperth O 500LE units and one engine fire on a recently delivered STA O 500LE unit, I believe that it is fair to include this in the page as there is clearly some concern as to the O 500LE's safety when being powered from natural gas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.126.103 (talk) 01:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * "Numerous engine fires related to the overheating of the O 500LE's turbocharger have also occurred in Sydney and Perth which has further lessened the chassis reputation, particularly in relation to its natural gas powered operation" must also be in the source which it really isn't. The TWU's report states this "However, we are told that this is the sixth gas bus fire." doesn't mean that it's fact 6 and isn't reliable nor does it state the cause. Same goes for the Perth Now report. The source must fit the content which none of them do. Bidgee (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Many news sources have now gone offline as they have archived older articles which makes the process difficult, just because a source detailing the entire incident can not be found does not mean that the events did not occur. I am sure many reports and documents related to the fires can be found in Transperth's offices, however as I have stated, it is extremely difficult to make them accessible online. In my opinion I believe that the fires should be mentioned in the page, worded to your approval, as there is photographic evidence as well reports from drivers to support the fact that fires had occurred in both Transperth and Sydney Buses O500LE units which have presented safety concerns. This is in contrast to the claim in the article that "Most consider the O 500LE to be inferior to the O 405" which is far more opinionated than the claim which I am suggesting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.126.103 (talk) 01:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Doesn't have to be online. If you can give me the articles name and from what Newspaper/Service it's from then I can check and then use themas a source if it has the information needed. Your opinions are welcome on my talk page but Wikipedia has a Neutral Point of View policy. Bidgee (talk) 02:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Please leave the Griffith Central entry alone - it contains factual, harmless information that the locals (and others) need to be aware of. There is no valid reason to keep cutting the text. Thank you, TomTom33 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomtom33 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Austar
The ref that i added is very reliable, if you read that page you would see that this info was in a email that was sent to a Austar customer, this info is not on a public website anywhere so i don't know how else to add that ref.Thuringowacityrep (talk) 09:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Images on NAB article
Hello there - just because an image CAN be used given its copyright status doesnt mean it SHOULD be used. I'd argue that a photo of a company's building is not adding much value in an article. You have chosen the Australian and the Global headoffice buildings. Should there be images of the MLC buildling as well ? NAB has several hundred buildings in its portfolio. Which ones should be in there ? I dont think they add much. You could, for instance, make the Docklands buildling relevant by adding some content aroudn it (eg it was part of a culture change program) and reference it (there were some news artciels), but just posting the image without any relevance - I think not. Wizzzzman (talk) 20:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

York Park Map
Thanks for the better York Park map. Aaroncrick (talk) 11:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Issue on Reverting Edits In Article
Hello, I'm under the presumption here that there's a misunderstanding on linking to external websites, especially in the article of List of radio stations in Australia in which my original edit, which consisted of Darwin's 92.3 Top Country having an external link, was removed

The misunderstanding is that, Top Country, while not having an article on Wikipedia, deserves to have at least "something" people can read about it. Also, you might find that if external linking was not allowed "at all" then there would be many more edits to come, as I was only following what was already listed under other towns, also, Top Country is part of a Country Music network, which the other external links have not been removed, in this case I dont believe the link from Darwin's Top Country should be removed, unless the whole article is going to be looked at 58.175.41.204 (talk) 08:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

P.S. I'm not registered either

I'm confused
I thought I had done some "rv v"s on Whyalla, South Australia, but there's no sign of them. Can you take me gently by the hand and either explain to me how edit history can disappear, or politely commiserate with me how memory deteriorates with middle age? Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 21:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Perth, WA
Yeah on all three roads heading north, Wanneroo, Brand Hwy and Great Northern Hwy presuming the 50km's is a rough guide Gnangarra 12:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Removal of images in the Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner article
Since you have tagged images that are my personal shots, it is contigent on yourself to replace them. I am dumbfounded when the images were all marked as pd-self that you would do something like that. Bzuk (talk) 12:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC).
 * You do realize that tagging them then leads to a bot taking over? Bzuk (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC).
 * Note that I have not been active on Wikipedia due to a manuscript being completed for publication. Another editor actually tried to correct your tags but was reverted (by yourself?). The images are back but obviously more bots have been about, and are again challenging the images. What is the protocol that I am missing? Bzuk (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC).
 * I can't go into any details ATM as I've got to go to work but images must have information before being moved from Wikipedia to Commons. Reason for the transfer is that they can be used on the world wide Wikipedia projects rather then just one and it's really only the uploader who can add the information on images. Bidgee (talk) 19:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Marco (2008)
I've protected the article from editing as a result of an edit war. You have violated WP:3RR, but for now, I'll just warn you not to continue. If you continue to edit war, further action may be necessary. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That may be true, but edit warring is still unacceptable. While the page is protected, I would appreciate if you could discuss it with the editor and the IP on the talk page. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Kelly
No problem. (As it happens, I was just procrastinating!) I would, however, appreciate a reply to. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for such a thorough answer! Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * (I would have been satisfied by "Sorry, I don't know". I had wondered if you had "roll-back" and had used it, and if, perhaps, "roll-back" removed the history of that which it "rolled" back ... Pdfpdf (talk) 11:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC))

unrelated
By-the-way: Not of any great importance, but I notice that you don't make much use of the edit summary field. Is there any particular reason why you don't? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * a) It didn't show up. b) I had NO idea there were such technical difficulties!  (The univeral language of computer users is profanity)  c) Did/do you use roll-back?
 * Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:07, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Riverina
Hi Bidgee. Did you know about this at all? -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no idea who nominated it and how it got on the main page. If I had known I would have given it a tidy; it is beginning to look a little tired. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 07:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello there
My fellow Australian wikipedian. Can you please take a look at this anon edit to the Dog on the Tuckerbox page and see if it is right? Would reverting be the option here and placing a warning about unsourced edits (i did that to the anon before this) or just placing a citation needed tag? Thank You  Monster Under Your Bed  (talk) 04:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

York Park
Ruhrfisch who did the peer review, said "B class seems fine to me, though I do not usually assess sport articles" (on my talk page) and Mvjs said "From a quick look at the article, it looks pretty solid, I'd probably say definitely B-class". (Mvjs talk page) So whats your problem?? :s Aaroncrick (talk) 04:46, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not in the peer review. I asked Ruhrfisch what it should be rated and it was said that "B class seems fine to me", so it's not just me that thinks that it's B-class. Ruhrfisch or Mvjs haven't done any large amounts of editing in the article. Aaroncrick (talk) 05:06, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It clearly states in the peer review Refs do not have to be in the lead except for direct quotes and extraordinary claims. Aaroncrick (talk) 05:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This is my last reply on this issue. The claims made in the article are not minor claims as I've said fix the issues and then I'll see no issues for a B-Class rating otherwise you're just wasting my time by discussing (repeating it) about it when you could be fixing those issues. Bidgee (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)