User talk:Bielle/Archives/2011/July

So...
What's the news on the user OrangeMarlin? Has anyone heard from him, or heard anything? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I would think, assuming good faith and all that, whatever the outcome, Wikipedia will be way down the list of "people" to be advised. I have heard nothing but have no connection with him, here or in RL, so I wouldn't expect to hear anything. Bielle (talk) 02:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I guess we'll find out eventually. I don't know who he knows well here. And obviously I don't know his actual name. We'll see. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 02:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Scull and Bones
According to the Robbins book, the society's original name was Scull and Bones. I'll provide footnote, and I guess "thank you" for you undoing my edit.SLY111 (talk) 19:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)SLY111
 * The problem is that the two references at the end of the sentence cannot be accessed in order to confirm what you had newly added. Given how much attention this article receives, and how much work it has had, I am also having some difficulty accepting that no one before now has ever known about the society's first name.  I have no specialized knowledge; if you cite a source that can be confirmed, that's all to the good. If others have problems with the addition (or the source), I am sure you will hear.  You are welcome. Bielle  (talk) 20:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Full Moon: Friday, July 15
It has to be. They're everywhere. Bielle (talk) 04:22, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

New York State of Mind
Just a heads up that there is a section named after you on the RD Talk page -- [] -- LarryMac  | Talk  14:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have already sent User:Jimbo_Wales (the founder and owner of Wikipedia) an email. Let's see what he does if he gets involved. Willminator (talk) 16:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * As I don't know what is in the email, I have no comment to make about it. I am sure he will respond appropriately. Bielle (talk) 17:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, as the top administrator, he will do what he thinks is best whether he decides to do something or not. The point is that I want to have good time here, and I've been having a good time until now. Regardless of my low status, I would like to be treated as a wiki brother just like I want to treat you like a wiki sister as Wikipedia commands us to. I would like to get along with you like with everyone else. Look, I have a lot of questions and I like to learn about a bunch of things, and I like to contribute to others' knowledge too. My interests are in the media, American history, American politics (I do plan to ask a question in the Reference Desk related to what belief in taxes, immigration, etc. has to do with a particular view of religion and science), the economy, science, religion, city government, etc. Anyway, I don't think that I needed to be put down like that just because of some follow up comment I made. If you wish, can you strike out the last few comments of yours and mine in the Reference Desk? Regards and I wish you well.... Willminator (talk) 18:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S: Before I knew I couldn't change anyone's post for any reason, I changed my post, the one exactly above your reply that says, "4325 words now, and you still haven't got an answer that satisfies you?". Before your posts and mine to yours, I had a post which User:Googlemeister responded to, but did not answer my question, so I deleted that 2 days ago. Maybe you can go to the history and revert that and if you do, it'll erase your posts and mine to yours, but that is if you wish. Correct me if I'm wrong, but according to the rules, his post and mine are the ones that should be kept originally, not yours nor my replies to yours. Willminator (talk) 22:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I have commented on this matter here. Bielle (talk) 03:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Your attituted
I deleted you’re replies, so I’m replying to you here. My New York question is in no way a debate nor am I going to use this to write an article. Actually, I wrote here so far more than 1,500 words. 1,000 of those words is my long introduction to the question. 500 of the rest of my words are follow up questions. I don't care who has the longest or shortest answers. By the way, I think that my question is important, and the people who replied seem to agree. My question does not violate Wikipedia’s policies, so it’s legitimate. I've seen less important questions in my opinion with longer answers and more important questions in my opinion with less answers. I thought that “Cultural Level of Slaves” (that’s what I meant) was not important because I’m not into that presently (I don’t know if that will change in the future). Let those who want to my answer my question answer it. Don’t prohibit anyone of doing so. The only person I’ve seen so far complaining about the question is you.

I still think that you're breaking the Wikipedia policies I've mentioned above, and you haven't responded against my charge. Please be respectful to me and my povs as I’m being with you (If you feel I haven’t, please forgive me). The first 2 sentences of my previous post to you, I let you know the Wikipedia’s rules I thought you were breaking. I was trying to be nice to you, but why are you still being nasty and rude to me? If you reply, I will not reply because I don’t want to debate you because that will be breaking Wikipedia’s rules, and I don’t want you to be an obstacle to my contributions. Instead, I'll unfortunately report you to User:Jimbo_Wales by email first if you do that next time, and I don’t want to do that. I don’t know your history, but I’m starting to suspect that you’re a troll, and I suspect that because I came across trolls before. I came to Wikipedia to contribute and learn, not to play around. Don’t give me the trouble that I had to endure in Conservapedia.

Regards and take care. Willminator (talk) 02:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I have re-inserted my comments and the one of yours that you had removed, inadvertently, I presume. You do not get to decide whose answers are kept or deleted, nor do I, though either of us may comment. If others find that either of us have been rude, then we should, of course, reconsider.
 * My "history" is all here for you to examine at will. I'd be interested if you (or anyone else) can find anything troll-like in it. I might learn something. If your "history" is at Conservapedia, that's harder to check. Bielle  (talk) 02:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Interesting. I've never come across a user name before with a 5-year block from Conservapedia. Bielle (talk) 02:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S: I got blocked indefinitely from Conservapedia because I asked about the death of this Conservapedia administrator there. His Wikipedia talk page is User talk:TK-CP by the way. He was a good friend of mine. We emailed each other constantly. I asked Andy Schlafly about why he died of cornary artery disease. That's when I got blocked for some reason. I did not troll around. Willminator (talk) 03:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Conservapedia appear to block people at semi random and for very minor offences for a very long time so a 5 year block isn't exactly surprising. The fact someone would think it worthwhile to edit conservapedia in the first place may be. Incidentally, I'm not sure why anyone would ask a third party why person A died when said third party didn't even apparently know person A well enough to know they died. Particularly if person A is their friend. Nil Einne (talk) 13:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * As Andrew Schlafly is the owner and founder of Conservapedia, I assume that writing to him there is akin to writing to Jimbo here. I get the impression, given how fast Willminator was to email Jimbo about my supposed sins, that it is a much more common appeal there than here. Perhaps Schlafy is a hands-on micro manager; I don't know. Bielle  (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2011 (UTC)