User talk:BigDataOntologist

Nomination of Leaders of Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leaders of Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leaders of Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 16:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aviva Lev-Ari


A tag has been placed on Aviva Lev-Ari, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/category/lpbi-group-e-scientific-media-dfp-rd-m3dp-rd-drug-discovery-us-patents-sops-and-team-management/lpbi-group-founder-aviva-lev-ari/, https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/founder/list-of-publications-1983-2004/, and https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2018/03/06/reflections-on-a-four-phase-career-aviva-lev-ari-phd-rn-march-2018/}. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 16:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MER-C 15:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear Eostrix. My name is Steve Wright. I am not sure how to best communicate with you and my time is unfortunately limited. I once worked with Aviva 20 years ago and I followed her career and work with LPBI with interest, although I am not a member. Last week Aviva asked if I would consider creating 2 Wikipedia entries for her. I got to sit in one the one of their meetings with medical researchers around the world and hear about the exciting things they are doing and confirm for myself their value to society. After that I agreed to attempt the write-up. Aviva and her team agreed to let me use their artwork in Wikipedia Commons and they pointed out URLs that would make for good source references. So I created the 2 pages in the Sandbox and got the OK from LPBI to move it to the Commons. Now I see the pages are gone and I do not know where to find the pages in order to make corrections. Also, the CSO of LPBI and other in the Group are willing to edit the pages till it is acceptable to publish. Where can we find the pages and is it OK to have them engage in the editing of the pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigDataOntologist (talk • contribs)
 * Steve, please read Conflict of interest, Paid-contribution disclosure. In additional Copyright violations is relevant given that copied verbatim a few pages from the organization's website. Note that editors with a COI generally are not supposed to create articles directly and should use Articles for creation. Irrespective of COI/PAID/Copyright, In my assessment (based on a source search) Aviva is not notable (see Notability, Notability (academics)) in the Wikipedia sense and the organization isn't either (see Notability (organizations and companies)).-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 06:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)