User talk:BigDster

August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Concordia University (Oregon) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Concordia University (Oregon) was changed by BigDster (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898476 on 2020-08-18T09:01:07+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Concordia University (Oregon), you may be blocked from editing.   Nyook ✉ 09:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Nyook ✉ 09:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Thats a true fact why can't I help you guys out I'm not trying to have a edit war I'm sorry I thought I was helping honestly I'm sorry but why aren't you all accepting my factual edits? BigDster (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)