User talk:BigHairRef/Archive 1

RE Revert on Wii Remote section in Wii
That would be here. Just64helpin 21:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to the Nunchaku article
It regards to your edit, the "Nunchuk controller" article redirects to Wii Remote. Please see Talk:Wii Remote for more information. Just64helpin 20:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Deliberately adding a redirect link seems highly irregular. The point of redirect pages is to lead the reader to the correct article. On certain browsers, the redirect doesn't even point to the subsection, but to the Wii Remote article as a whole.  Just64helpin 17:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Dear BigHairRef,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that your edit count is to low. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 20:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

BBC News 24 Good Article pass
Hi, thank you for reviewing the BBC News 24 article and passing it. Your comments will definitely be taken on board to improve the article further. Thanks again! Wikiwoohoo 22:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for your kind comments! Philippe Beaudette 01:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Strategic Air Command Wings
Hi BigHairRef; I'm a editor from New Zealand. R.E. Mixer is blanking sections in this page because it was a massive page and the articles listed are being moved to sub-articles for Air Refuelling Wings, Bomb Wings, Fighter Wings etc etc. That's why the LongPage tag is up the top. So please do not revert removal of the text in this case because it is being preserved in sub-articles. Best regards from Down Under Buckshot06 01:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, the Aussies haven't exactly learned respect for you guys either. Fancy taking back the Ashes just like that!! They should have had the decency to lose to Britain for a while...

Buckshot06 01:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Flood (Halo) GA
I added the links to an online repository for the transcripts. Is that sufficient? Dåvid ƒuchs (talk &bull; contribs) 16:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for pointing that out, I linked to the wrong level. They all should be fixed. Dåvid ƒuchs  (talk &bull; contribs) 17:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

William Goebel
I have asked the uploader to be more specific in his fair use rationale for the image of William Goebel, which he has done. I hope this will allow the article to pass its GA review. Thank you for taking time to review this article. Acdixon 14:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I noticed that the article on William Goebel is still on hold. I have been expanding it recently. Have these expansions caused further concerns that need to be addressed before the article passes a Good Article review? Acdixon 14:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delay was no problem; thanks for promoting the article. It's my first successful Good Article! Acdixon 17:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Platform game
Added a bunch of cites where you felt they were needed, and addressed the claims of original research, cleaned up the article a bit, and took new screenshots and uploaded them with a fair use rationale for each (a few of the old shots were mine, so I just added FU for them). I think it should be all good now, but I'm awaiting your thoughts.Frogacuda 06:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, I removed the "many felt" claim, because it was a little weasely, and replaced it with a more verifiable counter-claim. I explained a bit about the proto-platformer thing on the talk page. I'm not really sure it needs to be cited or changed. Frogacuda 23:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for all the help on getting the platform game article up to snuff. I removed the references to proto-platformers, as there were only two mentioned in the article, so writing around it was easy. Platform game is now the only game genre article with a GA. Lot of work. I think there's about 2 paragraphs left of the original article now. Now to work on the other genres... Frogacuda 01:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

User:12.160.33.128
Yes, it was me who blocked the user (see his last four edits). I believe an immediate block was in order and there was no point in warning him. (And thanks, I didn't realize that I forgot the signature. Fixed it now.) - Mike Rosoft 17:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Wayne Rooney
Hey there, thanks for the review and the heads up. Unfortunately it's too big a fix-up for my limited time at the minute. Hopefully the regular contributors can take the article further. Regards SeanMack 02:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Removing dates from Harry Potter articles
Hey BigHairRef, I agree that birthdates don't belong in the lead sentence (too in-universe), but in actuality, J. K. Rowling has set a date on this, even disregarding Nearly Headless Nick's being 500 in 1992 -- see the Black Family Tree, which Rowling released for charity. Draco Malfoy is born in 1980, as the fandom suspected, making Harry and Ron also 1980 and Hermione 1979. But we'll relocate this farther down into the article as is appropriate. Thanks, Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 03:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Away goals rule
Hello. I've undone your edit to Away goals rule; most competitions that use the away goals rule continue to apply it after extra time. An example from this year's UEFA Cup occurred between Hajduk Kula and CSKA Sofia: 0-0 on aggregate after 180 mins; 1-1 aet; CSKA advance on away goals (UEFA match report). In fact, I'm not aware of any competition where it only applies after normal time; the article gives the English League Cup as a reverse example where it only applies after extra time, not normal time; and the English League Playoffs abandoned away goals altogether from the same concerns mentioned in your edit. If you know of a tournament where away goals apply after normal time but not extra time, it would be a useful addition to the article. Cheers, jnestorius(talk) 00:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, BigHairRef! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. A le_Jrb talk 17:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Try clearing your Internet Explorer cache and cookies etc. A le_Jrb talk  15:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There might be problems with Vista - I haven't tested it on that. Sorry... A le_Jrb talk  20:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign
A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 22:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi BigHairRef,

So you delete pages posted by smaller companies who are putting up information about their organization, ones that are written without trying to sell any product - but you leave big companies on wikipedia alone. I guess you can't fight the big companies and you prefer to bully small companies who don't have the guns to keep their information on the site. There have been stories in the main stream press about how corporations are using wikipedia for blatant marketing - and i just looked at a few of them and its amazing what they get away with compared to what I wrote about my company.

So, do you like to help the rich get richer rather than allow any company to put up information about their history, background, inventions, etc. I agree, using Wikipedia for marketing or to simply try to get traffic is wrong, but if big companies or well financed small companies can put their info up, then any company should be able to put up their history and information without being labeled "blatant marketing". Who are you to say which company is or is not relevant to have their information on wikipedia? What are the criteria for one company to be here and another company to not be here - the rules are there, but they are not clear.

If a small company crosses the line, you should give them a chance to make edits and put their information up. I attempted to make edits, got no feedback, and tried to do everything i could to comply. And yet, my name is up as clear as day in this site as if I am a scoundrel just looking to abuse this great site. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I respect wikipedia, i use it regularly, and I don't like blatant marketing on this site as much as you do.

I don't want you flaming me again, so that's why you won't see my name - but this is really wrong. Also, I'm sure you will delete this immediately as you won't have this type of criticism on your page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.225.94.107 (talk) 21:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content of marginal relevance (unnecessary trivia) to articles is not considered productive. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. [Jam][talk] 12:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)