User talk:BigHaz/Archive 5

Thanks
Thanks for notifying me, I accidently added ad rather than ab at the bottom :) --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr)
 * Those pesky templates. Can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 08:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you from me too
Thanks for the information on DYK candidates. --YankeeDoodle14 21:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Not a problem at all. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Fyra Bugg & en Coca Cola
Why did you moved the article "Fyra Bugg & en Coca Cola" to "Boogaloo"? Have you ever heard it? If, which version? The title "Boogaloo" was only used in the 1987 Eurovision Song Contest. It had to do with advertising rules. The original song text ("Fyra Bugg & en Coca Cola") was also used in Melodifestivalen, and played at Svensktoppen. Lotta Engberg performs the song "Fyra Bugg & en Coca Cola" with the original name on albums and concerts. When played on the radio in the Nordic countries, the original version is used. The "Boogaloo text" is also in Swedish, as the original text. This text is in Eglish: http://www.geocities.com/fyra_bugg/text1.htm also exists, but I have never heard it. I am not sure many young people today know anything about the "Boogaloo" text. I mean, look at the article 9 to 5 (Sheena Easton song) for example, which not is named "Morning Train" just because it's more known as "Morning Train" at one place outside it's home country. Also, the text "Fyra Bugg & en Coca Cola" today is known and remembered for describing 1980s culture.

Fyra Bugg och en Coca Cola, spela freestyle med fräck musik

means:

Fyra Bugg (a trademark of a 1980's chewing gum) and a Coca Cola, playing walkman with cool music J 1982) 15:39, 18 October 2006 (CET)


 * I know what it means and I'm aware of the history. I moved it because the song is officially (in ESC terms, if not anything else) known as "Boogaloo". It can be called whatever it wants in Swedish, or in any other language for that matter. When I get to the Swedish ESC entries, I'll tidy it all up.

As a comparison, was Albania's 2004 entry called "The Image Of You" or "Imazhi Yt"? The former title was performed for the world audience in Istanbul, yet the latter title won the Festivali I Kenges. I'll take the title more widely known any day of the week. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That Albanian song never had this background story. Many countries re-write the songs into English for the ESC so more people can understand what they sing, which was forbidden back in 1987 when all countries had to sing in their own languages. Lotta Engberg still sang in Swedish at the 1987 ESC, it was just a re-written text. J 1982) 20:10, 19 October 2006 (CET)
 * No, the relevant facts are still the same. A song wins the national final under one title and is performed at ESC under another one. The fact that both titles were performed in the one language is immaterial. I've just recently done some work on the Luxembourgish entries, for example, and Vicky Leandros' "L'Amour Est Bleu" originally existed as an article under the title "Love Is Blue". This wasn't the title it was performed under on the ESC stage, and neither was "Boogaloo" called "Fyra Bugg & en Coca-Cola" when performed. The article explains the title change adequately (and I'll look at it more carefully when I'm doing the Swedish entries to make sure that it says what it needs to say). This being the English-language Wikipedia, are people more likely to know the title under which it was performed at the ESC or the title under which it won the Melodifestivalen? As with all other songs with title changes, I'll take the ESC version. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Red Turban Rebellion
Thanks. You should have just tell me that it requires the adjustment of NPOV, so I could do it myself. I translated it from some unorganized Chinese sources, which is why the content is not very well written.

The way you rewrote it, um, because of you are unfamiliar with the actual event, it's actually false in context and misleading in many parts. I will try to re-adjust some of those while attempting to find more sources. Thanks. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites) 00:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I wasn't quite sure whether NPOV was the only problem when I posted that first comment. On a cursory look, it actually needed more than that, but in the event NPOV looks to have been the major point of contention. It looked a bit like a translation, which since it's from Chinese sources my hat goes off to you. I'll keep an eye on the page as well and see if there's anything which can be tweaked a bit, but I'll lay off any wholsale fixes unless you give me the go-ahead (or unless there are readily-available English sources I can consult to help with it). BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

CSD
I noticed you tagged the article Aaka for speedy deletion as "warcraftcruft". Please note that cruftiness in and of itself is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion. However, I did delete the article for lack of context. Thanks! --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 22:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That was the first thing I could think of, but I'll bear that one in mind next time. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Girraween High School
I just thought i'd like to inform you, regarding your vote, that WP:SCHOOLS has been rejected as a policy, so votes should not be based on that. TJ Spyke 05:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. At the time my vote was cast, that wasn't the case. Additionally, I think the fact of the notable alumna still stands as sufficient notability. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Context Note: As it turns out, TJ Spyke's claim was inaccurate. User:JoshuaZ had marked the proposal as rejected, but other users (User:Uncle G among them) have argued that the proposal remains very much live. Indeed, there appears to have been some creative number-crunching to argue that the proposal had been live for 2 years, rather than just over 2 months, which would've made it much deader than it actually is. Still, I believe that the proposal is flawed in that it allows for schools which are themselves probably less than notable but happen to have famous alumni (Girraween being one such) to get articles. I'm not and never will be a school-inclusionist for the simple reason that I think there are more constructive things to be, but I felt at the time that this one mightn't have got a fair hearing. The fact that proposal chicanery appears to have been used suggests that I may well have been justified in that assumption. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination on LGBT Simpsons Characters
All I did was put the template in, so it appeared automatically. Saying that, I don't why that's the first time I've seen it... SteveLamacq43 12:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Weird. I guess that's something to look forward to when I next nominate something for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
I'll keep an eye on the comments. Thanks for informing me. Take care -- Samir धर्म 00:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Not a problem at all. You were the first admin who came to mind, so I'm glad you're active at the moment :P BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Rugby League in Canada
First, thanks for helping me with the wikipedia information on how to sort everything. Second, could you please read either the Rugby Canada Super League page on wikipedia or the link you sent me, as it is an entirely separate sport (rugby union) and therefore irrelevent to the debate. It would be like using the NFL Europe as proof that Canadian football's played in Germany. I know the name is confusing, but in Canada they only know one rugby and a Super League is a natural name for a sporting competition. I take it living in Brisbane you know the difference? Whether the article should stay for historical reasons, or in case rugby league refers to Canada, I do not know. But there is not a shred of evidence for a single rugby league match in Canada since 2003, and evidence that the competition has stopped.James Bowes 15:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Point taken. The link wasn't loading properly for me at the time I posted it, so I could only go on the evidence I had - which was that it had been used in a previous AfD as well as that it said "Canadian", "Rugby" and "League". I see now that you're quite right, that it's in fact a union competition rather than a league one. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Branden Nardulli
I saw that you added a speedy db-bio tag to Branden Nardulli, which appears to be an autobiography page. I added a userfy tag, as sometimes the best way to deal with an autobiography page is to userfy it. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:58, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Good idea. Either solution works for me, so I presume it's up to the author. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD duplicate votes
As I've explained at the Village Pump discussion, the reason I'd mentioned it here, rather than in any more public forum, was precisely because it was only a minor matter. As you've chosen to move the issue into a more public location and respond to it in a particular manner, I have done so too. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 13:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * OKay, as I said, if I voted twice anywhere, then it was by accident and it is not my intention to continue to vote twice anywhere purposely. Take care, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 13:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Given that you've done it on at least two occasions, and once with several indications that it was deliberate, why should I believe that? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 13:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Because it's the truth. And besides, I'll probably take a self-imposed editing break to stave off those flaming and personal attacking me.  --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 13:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The evidence says otherwise, unless there's a solid explanation for why you would write a comment that reads "Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles is correct". BigHaz - Schreit mich an 13:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Evidence that read into too much is . . . (I hope you like Yoda speak!) :). Have a pleasant morning! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 13:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm yet to be given a different way to read the evidence. Is there one? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 13:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * There's always a different side to everything, and in this case it's the right side. In any case, don't blow things out of proportion and get all stirred up over nothing.  I just said that due to my upcoming busy work schedule, I'm going to take a break from Wikipedia for a while anyway.  So, this way, I'll know after a month or so for sure that any phantom accusations of IPs uses on my talk page will be BS.  Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 13:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * You can say that all you want, but what I'm asking you is what this different side is. I've tried to assume good faith, but unless you provide me with this interpretation then I simply can't. Merely saying "oh, there's another way of taking this" doesn't prove anything. I can say that the sky is red as much as I want, but it doesn't change the facts. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Look, although I really feel that everything is being blown way out of proportion, I'm calling it quits for at least a month or so. Y'all are wasting way too much time on this and it wouldn't right for others who use the same public computers as I to run into problems because of this.  I've read everyone's suggestions regarding the AfD debates and IF I even do decide to ever edit again in the future, I'll take this advice into account.  Happy Thanksgiving and best wishes for the future.  Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 01:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * You can say that as much as you like, but usage patterns prove otherwise. You're yet to provide a shred of evidence that you're doing anything but vote-stacking, spamming and generally being disruptive. Just saying "there are other ways to take the evidence" is pointless without showing how they can be taken that way. Just saying "there are other users who use my computer" is pointless without an explanation of why these other users act exactly like you (do you have an evil twin? That's about the best alternative explanation I can think of). Just saying that this has been "blown way out of proportion" is also pointless, since the processes you've been involved in (AfD, RfA etc) are important around here, and disrupting them is serious in any way, particularly this one. I do hope you learn your lesson from this and decide to contribute within the rules, but I think you'll need to admit wrongdoing first and foremost. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Context Note: Le Grand Roi is in fact now blocked for six weeks due to his activities. What I'd originally thought was simply a case of someone misunderstanding AfD etiquette turned out to be a case of widespread disruption, including to two RfAs. I was prepared to classify this as a case of overzealous inclusionism, but that simply wasn't the case. The lack of a viable alternative explanation or (more usefully) any sort of acceptance of wrongdoing in this case is of some concern. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Moja štikla
Hello BigHaz, sorry if I'm giving you a hard time over this article. I'm not touching it any more, that's up to you now. You can find my (final?) comment at the talk page. Anyway - your work on the subject of ESC is very impressive, so sorry once again if this takes away your time more than it's necessary.... GregorB 21:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Context Note: This probably shows the value of using the Talk page. It took only a matter of moments for a compromise solution to be reached on this article and not much longer for the page itself to be updated to reflect this. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA time?
What do you say? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Look, why not? Can't hurt to test the waters at least, although I'm sure I'd be an appalling admin. Just give me until the weekend, since I've got an exam on Friday and then I'll be free to do the RfA thing entirely. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 04:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't say that. I'm sure you'll pass. Especially with your good AfD debating and another pair of hands on DYK. Anyway, please enable your email. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should check it. Speaking personally, I have 269 threads in my 5 months as an admin on gmail, but there are probably 500 total perhaps. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I did check it. That was what prompted the question. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Seconded - I'll even make a rare foray into RfA to support. Yomangani talk 10:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * With insistence like this, how can I refuse (quite easily, but that isn't the point of the saying)? I'll accept a nomination if one is made and serve if the community wants me. Just give me until the 11th of this month, because I have an exam on the 10th and intend to celebrate the end of my undergrad career on the rest of that day. As soon as I'm vertical on the 11th, I'm all yours. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Did you know

 * What's happening ?Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you had the Bippu text in your cut-paste buffer when you notified my of the DYK. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Mrs Jenkins et al
Yes, please. I meant to put them up for deletion, and got tangled up in the AfD templates. I thought I had that sorted out, but if you can fix them better than I, I would be grateful. (And I do hope I wasn't messing them up further while you were trying to fix them...) Sanguinity 21:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I think we're all set. Ironically, it was actually the lead article in the AfD (Mrs Jenkins) that didn't have the right template on it - all the others went there, but she didn't. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Biography template
Fair cop (even admins aren't infallible), and well done for spotting it after it had lain undetected for so long.--Runcorn 23:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It's the least I can do. To be fair, though, had she not been DYKd, I wouldn't have seen the article and it could've lasted much longer. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Eurovision
HI just remember the year category e.g Category:Eurovision songs of 1993 Ernst Stavro Blofeld 10:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * My plan is to add them after the article-creation phase. That way I can double-check everything as I link the ESC article to the constituent songs. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Cho Chang
Thanks for your comments on the matter. =) –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 07:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Not a problem at all. With any luck it'll be cleared up soon enough. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help
BigHaz was a great help to me. I appreciate the time you spent to give me instructions on things to do, and tips. Thanks,Orokusaki 06:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Too esseistic?
Hi, just wandering if you can have time to provide me quotes of too much essay style and not article as you mentioned in your review Thanks Dorians1 02:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC) DorianS1 02:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I'll see what I can do. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I undeleted it...
... then added it to AFD for community consensus. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah. Somehow or another I'd misinterpreted what you'd written. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Ty (song)
Hi BigHaz, I replied to your question on my own talk page so as not to split the thread. EuroSong talk 15:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Tracy Grenzshsomething Hoax
Hey there, I changed your prod tag to CSD, I think this page exists to disparage someone. If you disagree feel free to revert.  •E l om i s•     09:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It's hard to tell for sure, although I imagine that the picture may well prove it. CSD seems reasonable enough. Either way, it's not long for this world. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Csd
Thanks for csd of the article I created by mistake. Cheers. Siba 09:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. It's an unusual category to boot. I hadn't realised there were any Swedes of Iranian ancestry. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Lowell Tuckerman
Ooops, it's a speedy delete repost, not an AfD, is there a seperate tag for that? John Reaves


 * There's no category for that, actually. The idea is that if something was Speedied or Prod'ed and comes back, we're supposed to think "Oh, so someone did object to the deletion". Of course, if it gets Speedied 27 times in 30 minutes and still obstinately comes back, some kind admin may well treat it with salt. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, thanks fpr the clarifacation. Also, your userboxes seem to contradict your comprehension of Arabic.  Just thought I'd give you a heads-up. John Reaves


 * Funnily enough, they don't. I can read the Arabic script (and tell you that this word says "zakat" or "Oman" or whatever) perfectly. In terms of being able to contribute at all in that language or use Arabic sources for my own articles, I have zilch comprehension. My vocabulary is so minute that when vowel marks are removed I can make an educated guess about maybe one word in a sentence. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, just checking. John Reaves 11:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * 's all good. In a way, you kind of touched on a bit of a raw nerve without realising it. I'd give anything to have workable Arabic, but it's one of the really tough languages out there. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)