User talk:BigLittleColin

December 2015
Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Breaking Bad (season 5) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --allthefoxes (Talk) 17:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Breaking Bad (season 5). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. If you think your edit is constructive, please discuss it first on the articles talk page before editing again. --allthefoxes (Talk) 18:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Breaking Bad (season 5) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Public sector. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Public sector was changed by BigLittleColin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939482 on 2015-12-03T03:36:03+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Striking the ClueBot warning, the edit was in no sense vandalism, although there is room for debate whether it was an improvement Noyster (talk),  10:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Recent reverts
Hello BigLittleColin, sorry to see you've had that experience. Please continue to contribute, it's not always that bad! My advice, if one of your edits is reverted, even once, don't just reinstate it as someone is certain to call that "edit warring". Either let it go or open a discussion: the article's talk page is the recommended place to make your case, although since many of these are little watched, it's best to also put a brief comment linking to that talk page on the reverting editor's user talk page and that of anyone else who has entered the debate. Good luck Noyster (talk),  11:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)