User talk:BigPapaChuck28980

April 2020
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, BigJizz420, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.'''A username should not be promotional, appear to represent a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. However, you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87". You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Any name that has sexual or drug-related connotations is not going to be acceptable. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Onward to 2020 19:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

By your username restrictions this username should not be inappropriate in any way. I just want to make beneficial edits to Wikipedia, stop impeding me from doing so.BigJizz420 (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Reblocked
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page.

Despite us telling you that you would not be unblocked with a username referencing marijuana, you snuck one by us. 28980 does indeed reference marijuana. As you are going out of your way to be deceptive, I have converted this to a hard block. You now need to pick a new username and explain your bad behaviour. So far, you have gone out of your way to demonstrate you only plan to disrupt Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

I am not making a new username. If you had to do research to be offended, then it is obviously not offensive. I will ask nicely for you to unblock me, I have no intention to deface this website, if I did, I would not put this much effort into it. You can check the one edit I made on Quenton Nelson's Wikipedia page, it was thoughtful and referenced. Please unblock me, my name is obviously fine and clearly abides by all Wikipedia policy.BigPapaChuck28980 (talk) 00:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It didn't take me exhaustive research, I just had to google the number you put in your name. Is there a particular reason you want to reference sex and drugs in your username?  Would you walk in a public place and announce "Big Jizz" as your username?  In any event, you are free to make another unblock request and hope to convince another heretofore uninvolved administrator to either change your username or unblock you without doing so, but I don't think it likely to succeed, and I would oppose such an effort(and I suspect Yamla would as well, though I do not speak for them). 331dot (talk) 07:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note that the username policy does not permit usernames that are disruptive, which referencing (in many places) illegal activity and sex is. 331dot (talk) 07:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You did not respond to one thing I said, please think over your response and put some thought into if I'm really doing anything wrong and actually respond to the points I made and the things I said, thank you.BigPapaChuck28980 (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll respond: you were giving a chance to pick a username that is in agreement with our guidelines. It is not up to the admins to respond to your complaint about the rules here; it is up to you to respond to their questions if you want to play here. Do not think that this is somehow a free speech zone and you have a right to be here. This is your last chance: you either propose such a name, or I take away talk page access. We're writing an encyclopedia here, not dropping references to drugs or quantities of semen. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

If you think I am so dead set on disrupting or vandalizing Wikipedia why don't you ban me when I actually do so? My current username falls completely within the guidelines and for all anyone knows without literally doing research is a random set of numbers. I don't know what your huge problem with me is but I really just came here with no intention to hurt anyone. I was enthusiastic and excited to contribute to a website that I use daily and you have stripped that enthusiasm from me.BigPapaChuck28980 (talk) 15:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It isn't a random set of numbers. We all know what it means, it didn't take research to find out(unless you count 5 seconds on Google as research), and it does violate the username policy.(have you read it?) We don't have a problem with you, at least until you decided to be sneaky, we have a problem with your choice of username. When you are ready to follow the rules and basic standards of decorum appropriate for any public place, you will be welcome. 331dot (talk) 16:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS Appeal
Due to an issue with the UTRS system, your appeal may not have been filed correctly and your appeal key may not work properly. If you still wish to appeal, please file again. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)