User talk:Big Chief Thinker

Welcome!

Hello, Big Chief Thinker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Bower Park Academy does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 15:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

London as a county
Please stop updating articles about places to name the county as "London". There is no longer any county of "London". It used to be a county, but even when in existence it did not correspond to the places you are modifying. Thanks! 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 15:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The county of London was abolished in 1965, & replaced by Greater London. People generally refer to Greater London as London, much as I'm sure they did with the county of London. Romford is not in Essex, it hasn't been since 1965. Even when it was, there was no need to write Essex because Romford is a special post town. So tell me, which is more incorrect, putting Romford, London, or putting Romford, Essex? For your information, Greater London is a county for ceremonial purposes.
 * Then please change the link to Greater London, and not London. Thanks!   78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 15:58, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm Kashmiri. Your recent edit to the page Cockney appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  kashmiri TALK  10:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 * How is it incorrect information you wombat? Yeah, yeah, threaten to 'block me', ya BIG bully!

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Greater London, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop defaming one of London schools. Wikipedia is not a place to publish libellous texts.''  kashmiri TALK  22:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Quit your moaning fool! Go ahead, block me. If i so choose, I'll simply set up another editing name.


 * Editing while blocked will lead to a further ban, read WP:SOCK. Why don't you just read the WP:RULES of editing the Wikipedia, behave in a WP:CIVIL way and make useful contributions? Editing here is not compulsory, but if you want to add your knowledge you need to play by the rules. Calling fellow editors names is not appreciated here.  kashmiri TALK  09:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Editing while blocked will leave to a further ban, hahaha! I suggest that if the 1st ban ain't successful then neither will any following ones. You've made me laugh mate. You really take this all seriously don't ya bruva? Look, i ain't tryna foul up your little site. I'm not 100% sure how to go about editing in an effective manner yet. Understand that I'm not interested in bringing Wikipedia down, think it's a useful little site, but your rather rude & arrogant bullying don't help. Be advised that the way you've spoken to me is exactly the sort of thing that would provoke some little oiks into dismantling your site. I personally don't hold with that kind of malice, but tread carefully, there are some right trolls out there. Have a good day though.

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

regarding editors and editing at Wikipedia
Hello again, Big Chief Thinker. As mentioned above, your editing behavior here has drawn the negative attention of other editors. I'm going to step out of my usual editing habits and try to mediate. It seems to me that you want to be a productive editor here, but are having some difficulty understanding what Wikipedia is about. It isn't a chat-board where free-for-all opinions about topics and other users are the focus. Wikipedia is one of the most used sites on the internet, a result of collaboration amongst thousands of editors. This means we have to find a way to get along. To accomplish this, over a period of time Wikipedia has developed several important policies, and I'd like to take this opportunity to highlight a few of them that I think you'll find useful when trying to understand why certain things are happening. First is the verifiability policy. In short, this means that we create content in such a way that others may check our work, so therefore we aren't allowed to make a statement and claim "It's because I said so". We also present content from a neutral point of view. This not only means that we try to present information from numerous viewpoints, but that we also do not focus unduly on negative aspects, and particularly when the negative aspects are unsourced. When it comes to interacting with other editors, Wikipedia has a policy of no personal attacks. Your responses above and several of your edit summaries have clearly violated this policy, and that is the main reason you were mentioned at the administrator's noticeboard, a place where no constructive editor wishes to be mentioned. I am taking the time to write all this because I think you have a lot to bring to this project, and I want you to be productive here, and have fun doing it. You mentioned that if you were blocked, you could just start another account and start trolling, and bring down this "little" site. Frankly, most of us are bored with such threats. Do you imagine you are the first to think they could troll Wikipedia into oblivion? Yet, here we remain, as one of the most-used resources devised by man. Anyone can destroy, it takes no skill whatsoever. Building, which requires working with other flawed human beings, on the other hand requires skill, talent, and patience. The choice is ultimately yours. I know which one I hope you pick. There are many other editors who are willing to help. Join us! 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 01:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Alex Day. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. BZTMPS ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  16:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)