User talk:Bigals

"having no citations" is not a speedy criterion. In fact, it's not even a criterion for deletion--only if it is actually unsourcable, not just currently unsourced. DGG (talk) 14:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

That was not the main reason I tagged it. I tagged it because it was "Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." and I explained this on the talk page of the article. Bigals (talk) 20:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, if you're referring to the song I tagged, you're probably correct (note: not sure which article you're referring to DGG). Thanks for the heads up if it was for the song. Bigals (talk) 20:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)