User talk:Bigassfunny

April 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at La Tale. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Signed, The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (Talk) (Contributions) 01:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bigassfunny! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Johnuniq (talk) 03:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC) Johnuniq (talk) 03:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC) Please examine WP:CIVIL. Edit summaries such as in diff are not acceptable. Johnuniq (talk) 03:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)