User talk:Bigbaby23

Jessica Eye
Hi Bigbaby23, I have reverted you edits for the above page. Info provided is not main for the WP:LEAD section. Jessica Eye lost and missing weight is recored in the body text and not main point enough to be in the lead. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert and warning
Listen, Bigbaby23, you are not permitted to submit promotional content, including entire paragraphs of lengthy quotes. You also need to start observing WP:TONE ("gutsy," etc.), otherwise you risk the abovementioned discretionary sanctions on living persons being imposed on your account. Thanks and good luck. El_C 19:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khabib Nurmagomedov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greatest of All Time.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Haim Eshed
Hello. Unfortunately one or more of your recent contributions to Haim Eshed have been reverted. Even though I’m sure this edit was made in good-faith, it reverted to a version that has not gained consensus from other editors. Consider debating on the article’s talk page. For more general advice on editing see the Contributing to Wikipedia page.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 14:47, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Haim Eshed, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. AussieWikiDan (talk) 04:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Pentagon UFO videos. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Pentagon UFO videos. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The Bushranger One ping only 09:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

331dot, Though this is very disheartening and disappointing to know, I appreciate your candor.Bigbaby23 (talk)

Important message
— Paleo Neonate  – 16:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pentagon UFO videos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katie Mack.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:AE discussion
Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. jps (talk) 20:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and personal attacks. I'm sorry, Bigbaby23, but the latest influx of disruption and insults on your part crosses a line. Please note that if you end up successfully appealing this block (please refer to WP:GAB on how to do so effectively), an Arbitration enforcement topic ban from anything WP:FRINGE or WP:ARBPS will immediately come into effect. Good luck. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 02:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. El_C 18:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)