User talk:Bigbangtara

Nomination of No. MERCY (trainee) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article No. MERCY (trainee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/No. MERCY (trainee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tibbydibby (talk) 23:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 20:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

To reiterate, I would understand if I got blocked early on, but now that I have “reformed” so to say, I don't understand why I am blocked.}}
 * The real problem is this edit--without any kind of explanation, information is restored, of the kind specifically discussed and disallowed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture. Note that this is the kind of edit that's typical of the typical disruptive throwaway K-pop account. Drmies (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Sigh...I see where you're coming with that edit. Honestly I did that out of impulse. I didn't see the reason why chart was gone. It was something that I saw in all kpop related articles, so I thought that their was maybe some kind of mistake...I didn't know that many other editors decided to do away with the charts. If I did I would have left it alone. Believe it or not, I was actually planning on re-editing it to return it to what you had, with a small piece of information on the members (Meaning their position, like many other band articles). Due to the fact that on another editors talk page I saw their reason why they were doing away with the charts, and I completely understood. All I can say is that I'm sorry for that one edit, I can promise you that I'm not trying to be a “typical disruptive throwaway K-pop account”. I'll admit that I was one at the beginning. I was editing with the thought process of a kpop fan, not realize what I was doing. Like I said in my unblock appeal, I am trying to 'turn a new leaf', and just contribute to the site. Bigbangtara (talk)
 * So, you are the 76 IP and the 99 IP from the edit history of Topp Dogg? Who else were you? Because that material didn't come out of nowhere. Drmies (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Wait what? What do you mean who else am I? Material? I'm sorry but I am genuinely lost...
 * This material, which wasn't written by "Bigbangtara". Was this when you wrote it? Or were you one of the many earlier IP editors in that history, some of whom geolocate to the same place the 76 IP hails from? Drmies (talk) 01:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Ok bout that...I've only been bigbangtara. So essentially when I saw that the Topp Dogg article was edited down, being stupid I decided to revert it back to what was before. I just didn't realize why the article went from several paragraphs to one. It wasn't my previous materiel, I copied the previous article, pasted it, than I just kept reverting it whenever it edited back, and eventually got blocked for being in an edit war. After your warning I did read the rules and some talk pages, and realized what was wrong with that one article. Things like being way too riddled with fan rabbles and kpop jargon. Hope that made sense...