User talk:Bigbellybowl

April 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Donát Bartók. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * And you're still doing that. Plus you are not leaving edit summaries. The two combined are disruptive, and if you're yelling at another editor ("stop doing that") in an edit summary, you should maybe set a better example. Listen, I have no qualms about blocking you for disruptive editing. The LEAST you could do is indicate where that material is from--your edits are indistinguishable from those of a vandal. In fact, why would anyone believe your edits? Drmies (talk) 21:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Flags
Hey, thanks for all the updates. But please do not add flags in the infobox, thanks. Kante4 (talk) 14:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yanis Lenne
Hello, Bigbellybowl. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Yanis Lenne, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Yanis Lenne to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Xevus11 (talk) 03:40, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Xevus11 you can take a look now it is better

October 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Final warning: no more unexplained, unverified edits. Drmies (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

what for??? if you're talking about martin tomovski i'm macedonian so i know beter than you bro You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:47, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Can't you read? Unverified and unexplained edits. Last time. Drmies (talk) 21:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't call me "bro". Drmies (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for resumption of edit warring and unsourced changes after the previous block expired and general uncollaborative editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Gonçalo Ribeiro
Hello, Bigbellybowl,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Gonçalo Ribeiro! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Filip Čurlevski
Hello, Bigbellybowl,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Filip Čurlevski! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm SLBedit. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alexandre Cavalcanti, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add WP:FUTURE again. SLBedit (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Snowflake91 (talk) 19:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

July 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at RK Krim. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Riihimäki Cocks, you may be blocked from editing.   CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at RK Krim. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Still adding unsourced 2020–21 squad after several reverts. Snowflake91  (talk) 09:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Content blanking
Could you please explain why you've repeatedly blanked this sourced content?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually I see you've been warned about this multiple times above and have never responded to anyone's concerns regarding your disruptive editing. Therefore:

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruption through unexplained content blanking and refusal to engage collaboratively with other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:42, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

How can you ask me why i blanked this, can you give/show me where on the news has it appeared that he has played for thw kiel, and i would like it if you take down that block nonsence
 * Here you go. But that's neither here nor there as you blanked a load of sourced content, entire sections and relevant categories, with no explanation (three times on this article alone) and from the messages above you have been doing this to other articles as well. The directions for requesting an unblock are included in the block message.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

okay but what about this, i say i'm sorry and won't do anything wrong again and you make the block thing a 1 or 1 and a half time thing, so i can learn my lesson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbellybowl (talk • contribs) .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:03, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Again, you need to follow the unblock instructions and post an appeal for another administrator to review. Please read WP:GAB before doing so.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:03, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Goce Georgievski, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 05:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Country of origin of the Macedonian people born before 1991.
Hi, before 1991 then Socialist Republic of Macedonia was part of Communist Yugoslavia. It was neither a subject of the international law, nor an independent state. Its population consisted from Yugoslav citizens with Yugoslav passports. Please, do not add as a country of origin in Wikipedia articles for such people the then nonexisting modern-day state called North Macedonia, which declared independence in 1991. This is not correct from historical and political POV. If you wish, you can specify as a place of origin only then SFR Yugoslavia, or both:SR Macedonia and SFR Yugoslavia. If you wish, you can also indicate in brackets in the infobox, that this is now North Macedonia. See: Presentism and especially the subsection Shifting country names and boundaries. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 06:09, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for continuing the same kinds of unconstructive editing that have led in the past to warnings and blocks, including the following: persistent edit-warring on various articles, in some cases over a very long time period; removing maintenance templates without any explanation and without addressing the problems to which they refer; adding unsourced content to articles; persistently article content without explanation; removing references without explanation; failure to communicate, whether by means of edit summaries or talk page posts. In addition to those problems, all of which you have been warned about in the past, you have exhibited unacceptable incivility to another editor with whom you disagreed, and whom you told to "piss off". Since short blocks have failed to persuade you to take note of what you are told and change your ways, I am trying a longer block, in the hope that at last you will take notice. If you still continue in the same way after that, it is highly likely that you will be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. JBW (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)