User talk:Bigboarder109

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Charles Hamilton (rapper) has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://www.iamnotcharleshamilton.com/,http://charleshamilton.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Outside Looking
Please don't remove deletion templates from pages, this is vandalism. If you are going to edit and improve the page, please place a template on the page instead, as per the instructions. pablo hablo. 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Pink Lavalamp
A tag has been placed on The Pink Lavalamp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. --  Darth Mike  ( join the dark side ) 23:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Intervention Mixtape
A tag has been placed on Intervention Mixtape requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Aka042 (talk) 23:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Best Of The Hamiltonization Process
A tag has been placed on The Best Of The Hamiltonization Process requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. --  Darth Mike  ( join the dark side ) 23:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Why your articles are being tagged for deletion
WP:MUSIC states that: "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources." The articles you're creating do not have significant independent coverage in reliable sources, thus they are not notable. Hope that helps. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. --  Darth Mike  ( join the dark side ) 23:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Regarding this comment: "This article is true in everything it says and allows for people to learn about this up and comming artist. To take this off is not allowing for people to get tracklist of this artist first album." Nobody is saying that the information you provided is false, I just do not believe it is notable enough to be included in wikipedia.

AfD nomination of The Pink Lava Lamp and The Best Of The Hamiltonization Process
I have nominated The Pink Lava Lamp and The Best Of The Hamiltonization Process, articles that you created, for deletion. I do not think that these articles satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Pink Lava Lamp. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the articles to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --  Darth Mike  ( join the dark side ) 13:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)