User talk:Bigdaddybrabantio

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Bigdaddybrabantio! Thank you for your contributions. I am Sportfan5000 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Sportfan5000 (talk) 14:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=592414781 your edit] to LGBT rights in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 2012 Gallup poll indicated 61% support for gays and lesbians being allowed to adopt children.

Public opinion of same-sex marriage in USA by state.svg
There's a problem with the svg map, it seems like the key can't be updated to reflect the new key. --Prcc27 (talk) 02:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hey, I think I fixed it. Were you talking about the key here? Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 02:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. --Prcc27 (talk) 03:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Public opinion of same-sex marriage in USA by state.svg Update: Arizona
The Public opinion of same-sex marriage in USA by state map needs to be updated. --Prcc27 (talk) 21:57, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I will be replacing the svg map with the png map until the svg map is updated. --Prcc27 (talk) 00:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, uploaded! Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 01:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Public opinion of same-sex marriage in USA by state.svg Coloring
I think the coloring needs to be fixed... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Public_opinion_of_same-sex_marriage_in_USA_by_state.svg#Coloring --Prcc27 (talk) 04:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

GayTenn
GayTenn keeps edit warring. If they continue, I think we should request to have him blocked. --Prcc27 (talk) 19:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I made an edit to the file talk page. (Maybe he could actually explain why he is reverting back...) Hopefully we can get it settled there.
 * Er, I thought I did. You have it covered though. I have to go now, but keep fightin' the good fight! :p

Public Opinion Overlapping
Hi, I had to remove Michigan from the table because of overlapping polls. What should we do about polls that overlap? Talk:Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States --Prcc27 (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Public opinion of same-sex marriage in USA by state.svg Update
The Public opinion of same-sex marriage in USA by state.svg map needs to be updated. --Prcc27 (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=605675738 your edit] to LGBT rights in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:29, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Public Opinion Map Alabama Question Mark
I removed the question mark from the png map but the svg still has the question mark. --Prcc27 (talk) 01:44, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright. I guess we are using Inkscape to edit the svg now, so I will download that and edit it (I will also change Wisconsin to dark blue because of the new poll for them). Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 03:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Done! Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 03:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey. Not sure why but Wisconsin is light blue right now. Could you make it dark blue again? Thanks!71.230.71.243 (talk) 06:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I noticed that too. On the SSM public opinion page, the map wasn't updating for some reason. It seems to be fixed now. Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 16:21, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I added the most recent poll for Iowa, if you could update the map again, I'd greatly appreciate it. Also, not sure why but Wisconsin is still showing light blue :/.71.230.71.243 (talk) 20:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Kwami beat me to it! Hm, haven't noticed the map being glitchy lately. Maybe the old map is cached and not updating when you refresh? Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 01:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Public Opinion Map Striping
Hey, I don't think the striping is consistent. What do you think? --Prcc27 (talk) 05:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Nobody's made any objections so it looks like it's alright to go with the change... (I would do it myself but I don't have inkscape). --Prcc27 (talk) 04:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Done! Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 23:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Poll update
Hey! Just wanted to ask if you could update the map on the public opinion on SSM page (Illinois needs to be changed to dark blue). Thanks a lot!
 * Sure! Could you link me to the actual poll? I can't seem to find anything after March.
 * Hey! Sorry about responding to you so late. I haven't looked at that map for a few weeks now. The results only were listed in the Simon Review and not posted on the website for this particular poll. They mentioned the sample size and margin of error under Appendix A in the review. Thanks for the quick response too.Michiganb2323 (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright! Thanks. Updated the map. :) Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey, would you be able to update the public opinion map to dark blue for Wisconsin? Thanks! :) Michiganb2323 (talk) 03:34, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Done! :) Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 03:48, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello! Could you update the US public opinion graph on SSM to dark blue for Iowa? Thanks!71.230.71.243 (talk) 04:19, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Done! Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 17:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey! Could you please update Wisconsin's state color to dark blue/light blue striped? Thanks Michiganb2323 (talk) 07:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello, I've updated the Public opinion on SSM page. Could you please adjust the coloring on the map of the states? Thanks so much!Michiganb2323 (talk) 10:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Polls
You asked at Talk:Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States whether we should restrict ourselves to the one poll. My two bits there. I almost think we should. It really is sloppy to lump together polls with different methodologies; other polls look more pro or more con because they don't provide an option of 'not sure'. Someone who doesn't know or doesn't care is hardly an opponent of SSM, or a supporter for that matter. But if we mix polls, we get some bizarre results. Maybe we should have a separate table for the CBS/NYT poll, and another for other recent polls? Or two maps, one for CBS/NYT, and another for other recent polls? Or would that just be info overload without any real benefit? Worth discussing, I think. — kwami (talk) 21:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I definitely agree that we should have a separate table for any more recent polls that pop up. Reported public opinion can vary wildly between a period of a couple months, even, so I think it's important to do if we don't want to let the article become outdated. I'm also almost tempted to support two maps as well for the sake of getting rid of striping, but that might just be the minimalist in me talking -- not sure if that would really have an effect on understandability, etc.Bigdaddybrabantio (talk) 03:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride!
 You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!


 * What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
 * When? June 2015
 * How can you help?
 * 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
 * 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
 * 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2016
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
 * Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
 * Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
 * Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021 .--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)