User talk:Bigelarkin12

Welcome
 Hi Bigelarkin12, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Roleplayer Good luck, and have fun.

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Cirt (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt (talk) 03:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt (talk) 03:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

YOU ARE GOING TO LOOSE A WEBSITE VIEWER
I'm getting feed up with this website after my ban gets lift I will never come back to this website every again, so you lost a website viewer, just because how this website is runned. I will will put negitive comments about this websites on messgaes boards.
 * Why, because we won't let you post unverified content? – Luna Santin  (talk) 04:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

'M PISSED OFF AT THIS WEBSITE AND VERY UPSET - I'M GOING TO BOYCOT THIS WEBSITE AND MAKE NETGITVIE COMMENTS ON OTHER WEBSITES. SINCE THE ONLY FREAKIN WAY TO VERIFY WHAT I'M TRYING TO ADD IS TO WATCH THE EPISODE. IF YOU ONLY WATCH THE EPISODE THEN YOU WILL SEE THAT IS VERIFY IT SINCE THAT IS THE ONLY WAY. I DO NOT TRUST ANY OF ADMINS ON THIS SITE FUC****************************************************************** YOU ALL

Your talk page is now unprotected
Welcome back, you should know that we have a very specific policy on verifiability (at WP:V) for content. Basically it states that content must be attributed to reliable sources, simply being true isn't enough for content to be included. This policy is in place for our readers so, when they have to, they can quickly and easily check something. It's not up to them to prove something, it's the one that adds content. You're obviously here to try to improve the wiki, so I suggest you don't return to continually re-adding it in the manner which got you blocked previously. The passage about the editted family guy episodes has been challenged, so just find a source to back up your claim. —[ DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs ] 09:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Sourcing
Regarding - simply saying "tvrage.com" in the edit summary is not satisfactory for sourcing requirements. Please take a read through WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:CITE to get some familiarity with policies on the project regarding citing sources. Cirt (talk) 22:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * If you indeed have a position with FOX, that can't really be used itself as a source in the article, we must rely on WP:RS/WP:V sources, preferably secondary sources, for the type of information you would like to insert into the article. Also, if you are being prevented from inserting links from a specific site into the article on this project, there is probably a good reason for that related to a history of spamming from that site. Cirt (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Cirt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sceptre (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)